Intelligent Task Management Using Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing project management systems rely on manual estimation of task effort and scheduling, leading to inaccurate and inefficient project planning, especially for large projects with numerous tasks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing automated task management using machine learning to calculate task effort and schedule based on historical data, grouping related tasks for intelligent task grouping and reordering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual estimation of task effort and scheduling is used, then project management flexibility is maintained, but accuracy and efficiency of project planning deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask effort estimation accuracyVSAvoidproject management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service by using machine learning models to automatically estimate task effort and generate schedules without requiring manual intervention from project managers. The system learns from historical project data and autonomously provides accurate predictions, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and complexity by automating the estimation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical estimation processes with automated machine learning systems. Instead of relying on human judgment and manual scheduling, the system uses algorithms trained on historical data to automatically calculate task effort and optimize schedules, thereby improving accuracy while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual task scheduling is used for large projects, then system simplicity is maintained, but project completion time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion speedVSAvoidtime to complete project
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating task dependencies, estimating efforts, and generating optimized schedules before project execution begins. The machine learning models analyze historical data in advance to predict the most efficient scheduling arrangements, enabling faster project completion without sacrificing planning quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts scheduling parameters such as task start dates, durations, and resource allocation based on learned patterns from historical projects. By changing these parameters automatically through machine learning optimization, the system accelerates project completion while maintaining realistic and achievable schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If automated machine learning task management is implemented, then project planning accuracy improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask effort calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial automation by using machine learning for critical estimation tasks while maintaining manual control for strategic decisions. The machine learning models focus on calculating task effort and scheduling parameters where automation provides the most value, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead for less critical aspects of project management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical project data, performing the computationally intensive learning process beforehand. Once trained, the models can quickly make predictions with minimal computational resources during actual project planning, thereby achieving high accuracy without excessive real-time resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230351289A1Intelligent task management
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 CITRIX SYSTEMS INC
  • US20230351289A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351289A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351289A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to some embodiments, a method includes: receiving, by a computing device, information about a task of application, the task associated with a project; receiving, by the computing device, information about other tasks of the application including other tasks that have been completed and other tasks that have not been completed; calculating, by the computing device, a start date and an expected effort for the task based on analysis of the information received for the task and the other tasks; and causing, by the computing device, an update within the application to apply the calculated start date and expected effort to the task.