Intent Design Tool for Wireless Network Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tools lack the ability to effectively declare and automatically translate network communication intent into device configurations in wireless communication networks, leading to manual and inefficient processes, and do not support the dynamic configuration of network intent specifications for various use cases.

Innovation Solution

An intent design tool is developed to create and test custom communication network intent topologies, allowing users to design and deploy network configurations through a graphical user interface, enabling automated configuration of network pathways and resources, and facilitating the verification of intent compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual configuration methods are used to derive network device configurations, then network operators can achieve desired communication objectives, but the process becomes inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service configuration where the network controller automatically translates high-level intent specifications into device configurations without requiring manual intervention. The validation loop continuously monitors and self-adjusts configurations to maintain intent compliance, eliminating the need for manual derivation of network device configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-translating intent specifications into device configurations before actual network operations begin. The intent design tool allows operators to define and validate configurations in advance, and the automated translation process prepares configurations ahead of time, reducing real-time configuration time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If automated translation of intent to device configuration is implemented, then configuration efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated configuration translationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary intent design tool and validation loop that mediates between high-level intent specifications and low-level device configurations. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of automated translation, presenting a simple interface to operators while handling complex configuration transformations in the background, thus managing system complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the configuration process into distinct modular components: intent specification, automated translation, validation, and deployment. Each component operates independently with well-defined interfaces, making the overall complex system manageable through modular architecture. The validation loop is segmented as a separate feedback mechanism that independently monitors and verifies configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If network intent specifications are continuously validated, then intent compliance is ensured, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintent compliance verificationVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a continuous validation loop that provides feedback between the intent specification and device configuration. The validation mechanism continuously monitors network state and compares it against intended behavior, providing real-time feedback to detect and correct deviations. This feedback-based approach ensures reliability by maintaining intent compliance while using efficient algorithms to minimize processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The validation loop performs partial validation by focusing on critical intent parameters and high-risk configuration changes rather than validating every aspect of the network state continuously. This selective validation approach maintains reliability for essential functions while reducing overall processing time and computational resource consumption by validating only the most important aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11025504B2Intent design tool for wireless communication networks
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US11025504B2 patent drawing
  • US11025504B2 patent drawing
  • US11025504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described technology is generally directed towards an intent design tool for communication networks. A graphical user interface provided by the intent design tool can include a collection of communication network topology elements and a communication network intent topology design area. Selected communication network topology elements can be placed into the communication network intent topology design area, and connection types between the selected communication network topology elements can also be specified in the communication network intent topology design area, in order to define custom communication network intent topologies.