Intent-Based Document Ranking for Interpretable LLM Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional information retrieval methods struggle to accurately rank documents based on user intent due to reliance on linear ranking and keyword matching, leading to irrelevant results and overwhelming amounts of data, especially in large language models (LLMs) where responses are difficult to interpret and validate.

Innovation Solution

An intent-based data generation platform that employs a multi-stage process combining semantic similarity ranking and intent-based re-ranking to prioritize documents aligned with user intent, using vector representations and categorical labels to refine document rankings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional linear ranking and keyword matching methods are used for information retrieval, then the system is simple to implement, but the relevance and accuracy of retrieved documents to user intent deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument ranking accuracyVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ranking process is divided into multiple stages: initial retrieval stage, semantic similarity ranking stage, and intent-based re-ranking stage. Each stage handles specific aspects of the ranking problem, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy without overwhelming complexity in a single monolithic component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces semantic similarity as an additional dimension beyond traditional keyword matching. By computing vector representations and measuring semantic distances, the system adds a new dimension to the ranking space that captures meaning rather than just keyword overlap, improving accuracy without sacrificing the original keyword-based approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If extensive training models with multiplicity of inputs are used in LLMs, then the model's general-purpose language generation capability is improved, but the interpretability and validity of responses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage generation capabilityVSAvoidresponse interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an information retrieval intermediary layer between user queries and the LLM. This intermediary retrieves and ranks relevant documents based on semantic similarity and intent, providing interpretable evidence that mediates between the complex LLM processing and the user's need for understandable, valid responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where retrieved documents and their rankings are used to guide and validate LLM responses. The intent classification and semantic similarity metrics provide feedback mechanisms that make the LLM's generation process more transparent and verifiable against ground truth documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If conventional information retrieval returns all matching documents, then completeness of information is improved, but the overwhelming amount of data and irrelevance to user intent worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary semantic similarity ranking and intent-based re-ranking before presenting documents to the user. This preliminary filtering action identifies and prioritizes the most relevant documents based on their semantic relationship to the query and their alignment with detected user intent, reducing the need for users to sift through large volumes of less relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12406008B1Using intent-based rankings to generate large language model responses
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 CITIBANK N A
  • US12406008B1 patent drawing
  • US12406008B1 patent drawing
  • US12406008B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The systems and methods disclosed herein generates responses generated by artificial intelligence (AI) models such as large language models (LLM) using intent-based rankings of retrieved information. The systems and methods disclosed herein receives an output generation request for the generation of an output using a set of AI models. Using a first AI model, a set of documents are retrieved using the received output generation request. The set of documents are partitioned into chunks. The chunks are ranked using a distance between the vector representation of the received output generation request and the vector representation of each chunk. A second AI model classifies the output generation request and chunks using an intent of the respective output generation request or chunk, and generates a second set of rankings using the intents. The set of AI models generate a response using the second set of rankings.