Communication Intent Verification for Accidental Call Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unintentional inputs on communication devices, such as smartphones, often lead to unexpected and unwanted communications due to accidental brushes, taps, or bumps, especially when the device is in a pocket or bag, triggering actions like phone calls or messages.

Innovation Solution

A communication device with a processor that receives a request to initiate a communication, determines if it is unlikely, and requires a confirmation before sending, using various input devices and sensors to verify user intent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the device requires confirmation for communication requests, then accidental transmissions are reduced, but the communication speed and user experience are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of communication initiationVSAvoidcommunication speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the confirmation requirement based on detected context. When the device is determined to be in a pocket or bag (inferred from sensor data patterns), confirmation is mandatory. When the device is in normal usage conditions, confirmation may be waived, thus adapting the confirmation behavior to the situation rather than applying a static rule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of confirmation requirement based on detected context. By analyzing sensor data (accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor readings) to infer device location and usage context, the system adjusts whether confirmation is needed, effectively changing the confirmation parameter dynamically based on environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the device uses multiple input devices and sensors to verify intent, then the accuracy of intent detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user intent detectionVSAvoidnumber of input devices and sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing multi-functional sensors already present in the device for other purposes (accelerometer for screen orientation, gyroscope for rotation, proximity sensor for call detection) and repurposes them for intent verification. This avoids adding dedicated hardware while achieving accurate intent detection through multi-sensor fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses its own existing sensors and processing capabilities to verify user intent, rather than requiring external verification mechanisms. The processor analyzes data from existing sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor) to independently determine whether a touch was intentional, making the system self-verifying without additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12500973B2Apparatuses, methods, and computer-readable medium for reducing inadvertent user interface interactions
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US12500973B2 patent drawing
  • US12500973B2 patent drawing
  • US12500973B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, communication devices, and computer-readable medium are disclosed for preventing unintentional outgoing communications initiated from a communication device. In one embodiment, the method includes receiving a request via a first input device to initiate a communication to a contact, determining whether the request is unlikely, receiving a confirmation that the request is intentional responsive to determining the request is unlikely, and sending the communication to the contact responsive to receiving the confirmation.