Inter-Floor Transfer Rack for Inventory Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern inventory systems face challenges in efficiently managing large numbers of diverse inventory requests, leading to inefficient resource utilization, long response times, and high costs associated with incremental changes in capacity or functionality, making it difficult to accommodate fluctuations in throughput.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a management module that directs inventory items between automated and manual handling based on classification, using mobile drive units and inventory holders to optimize resource allocation and reduce trip times, allowing for dynamic changes in routing and infrastructure adaptation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system expands infrastructure and equipment to handle increased inventory requests, then throughput capacity is improved, but cost and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput capacityVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures task assignments and routing in real-time based on current workload, inventory location, and resource availability. The management module continuously optimizes which inventory items are retrieved from which locations and by which resources, allowing the system to adapt its operational structure without physical infrastructure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses universal inventory holders and mobile drive units that can handle multiple types of inventory items and perform multiple functions (retrieval, transport, delivery). This multi-functionality allows existing equipment to handle diverse inventory requests without requiring specialized infrastructure for each item type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If more equipment and resources are added to handle increased task volume, then productivity is improved, but resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask handling capacityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The management module receives real-time feedback on inventory item locations, resource positions, task completion status, and system workload. Based on this feedback, it dynamically recalculates and reassigns tasks to optimize resource utilization, ensuring that existing resources are fully utilized before additional resources are deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of inventory requests and proactively positions resources and retrieves inventory items before they are actually needed. By anticipating future tasks and preparing in advance, the system reduces idle time and ensures optimal resource utilization when tasks arrive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the system uses fixed infrastructure and routing, then system stability is maintained, but adaptability to changing demands decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoiddemand flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains stable core infrastructure (storage locations, equipment pool) while dynamically changing operational parameters (task assignments, routing paths, resource allocation). This dynamic reconfiguration allows the system to adapt to fluctuating demands without compromising the stability of its fundamental structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as task priority levels, routing preferences, and resource assignment criteria based on current system state and external demands. By adjusting these parameters rather than physical configurations, the system achieves adaptability while maintaining infrastructure stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10395152B2Amassing pick and/or storage task density for inter-floor transfer
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10395152B2 patent drawing
  • US10395152B2 patent drawing
  • US10395152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transfer rack on one floor of an inventory system can receive multiple containers each carrying an inventory item designated for an operation on a different floor of the inventory system. A vertical lift can move the transfer rack carrying the multiple containers from the one floor to the different floor. On the different floor, the multiple containers may be swapped for different multiple containers each carrying an inventory item designated for an operation on the one floor. The vertical lift may return the transfer rack carrying the different multiple containers to the one floor.