Inter-Model AI Interface for Job Posting and Candidate Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Employers face challenges in creating and refining job postings due to limited granularity and manual processes that fail to predict the effect of revisions on candidate pools, leading to unsuitable candidates and inefficient recruitment.

Innovation Solution

An inter-model interface using AI circuits to generate tailored job postings and refine candidate pools in real-time by analyzing user inputs, historical data, and predicting candidate suitability, providing insights for optimal recruitment decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual processes are used to create and refine job postings, then employers can control the creation process, but the granularity and refinement capability of candidate pools are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranularity of candidate pool refinementVSAvoidmanual process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the AI circuit to automatically refine candidate pools and generate job posting revisions without requiring manual intervention. The AI circuit independently analyzes candidate data, identifies suitable matches, and proposes refinements based on predefined criteria, freeing employers from tedious manual filtering while achieving high granularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with an AI-based automated system. The AI circuit performs data analysis, candidate matching, and job posting refinement tasks that would otherwise require human recruiters to manually review and filter through large volumes of candidate information, thereby increasing both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If employers manually review and refine job postings, then they can ensure accuracy, but the process is time-consuming and cannot simultaneously predict the effect of revisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of job posting refinementVSAvoidtime for creating and refining job postings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The AI circuit performs preliminary analysis of candidate pools and predicts the outcomes of potential job posting revisions before they are implemented. By pre-evaluating multiple refinement scenarios and their expected impacts on candidate suitability, the system allows employers to make informed decisions without time-consuming trial-and-error manual testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI circuit continuously learns from the results of previous job posting refinements and candidate matching outcomes. This feedback loop improves the accuracy of predictions and refinements over time, enabling the system to become increasingly reliable while maintaining rapid processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If traditional filtering tools are used, then the process is simple, but the candidate pool becomes overly narrowed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of filtering processVSAvoidcandidate pool diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The AI circuit dynamically adjusts filtering parameters based on the specific job requirements and candidate pool characteristics. Rather than applying fixed, rigid filters, the system modifies weighting factors and criteria thresholds to balance between maintaining simplicity of operation and preserving candidate pool diversity, ensuring that no potentially suitable candidates are incorrectly excluded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If manual processes are used to analyze candidate pools, then employers have full control, but they cannot achieve sufficient granularity or refine pools with many filters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranularity of candidate analysisVSAvoidsystem complexity for manual processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI circuit segments the complex task of candidate pool analysis into multiple independent processing modules, each handling specific aspects such as skill matching, experience verification, and cultural fit assessment. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high granularity in candidate analysis while managing complexity through modular design, where each module can be independently optimized and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250217772A1Inter-model interface to refine remote pool and user interfaces therefor
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250217772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217772A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of this technical solution relate to a system. The system includes a memory and one or more processors coupled to the memory. The one or more processors are configured to: generate, by a first artificial intelligence model receiving as an input a first object including a first textual description of an entity, one or more first metrics descriptive of the entity; generate, by a second artificial intelligence model receiving as an input one or more of the first metrics, a second object including a second textual description of the entity and a first metric; identify, by the first artificial intelligence model, one or more third objects each having at least one first property satisfying a first metric; and cause a presentation of a portion of the second object at a first portion and a portion of the third object at a second portion of a user interface.