Inter-Transport Block Time Interleaving in Wireless MBS

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems struggle to efficiently interleave multiple instances of transport blocks (TBs) in multicast and broadcast services, leading to challenges in soft combining and increased system latency.

Innovation Solution

The network entity transmits downlink control information (DCI) messages that schedule multiple instances of TBs, allowing for time-interleaved transmission. This includes using DCI formats that include TB indicators such as Hybrid PDCCH Indicators (HPIDs) and New Data Indicators (NDIs), enabling user equipment (UE) to perform soft combining of interleaved TB instances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple instances of TBs are time-interleaved for multicast/broadcast services, then spectral efficiency and resource utilization are improved, but soft combining capability is lost and system latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsoft combining capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the TB scheduling into separate DCI formats: Type 1 DCI for scheduling TB instances and Type 2 DCI for indicating soft combining requirements. This segmentation allows the system to maintain time-interleaving benefits while separately managing soft combining capabilities through dedicated control information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism using DCI format 2 as a mediator between the time-interleaved TB instances and the UE's soft combining process. This intermediary carries control information that enables UEs to properly identify and combine interleaved TB instances, resolving the conflict between spectral efficiency and soft combining capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple instances of TBs are time-interleaved, then resource allocation flexibility is improved, but processing complexity at UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation flexibilityVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of control information to different UEs based on their capabilities. Advanced UEs receive detailed DCI format 2 information enabling soft combining, while legacy UEs receive simplified scheduling information. This localized adaptation maintains resource allocation flexibility without uniformly increasing processing complexity across all UEs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If time-interleaved TB instances are transmitted, then system latency is reduced through faster resource utilization, but HARQ feedback timing becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem latencyVSAvoidHARQ feedback timing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring HARQ feedback timing parameters in the DCI format 2 before the actual TB transmission. This allows the UE to anticipate and properly time its HARQ feedback responses for time-interleaved TB instances, reducing system latency while managing feedback timing complexity through advance parameter provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250159682A1Inter-transport block time interleaving
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250159682A1 patent drawing
  • US20250159682A1 patent drawing
  • US20250159682A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A network entity may transmit DCIs to a UE to schedule instances of one or more MBS TBs, the multiple instances of the one or more TBs being time-interleaved. For example, the network entity may transmit a first set of DCIs scheduling a first set of instances of a first TB, and a second set of DCIs scheduling a second set of instances of a second TB, where at least one instance of the first set of instances may be interleaved with the second set of instances. In some cases, the first and second set of DCIs may include one DCI to schedule the respective set of instances, or one DCI per instance of the respective set of instances. Additionally, or alternatively, the network entity may indicate one or more parameters to the UE associated with MBS inter-TB time interleaving.