Cross-Application Interaction Architecture for Consistent User Actions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software platforms face inefficiencies in managing and organizing user interactions due to different interaction mechanisms across applications, leading to high resource utilization and user confusion.

Innovation Solution

A common interaction architecture is introduced, including a data model, API, and user experience to unify interaction operations across multiple software platforms and applications, reducing duplication and providing a consistent user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different interaction mechanisms are used across multiple applications, then each application can have customized interaction functionality, but resource utilization increases and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomized interaction functionalityVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal interaction mechanism that serves multiple applications across different platforms. A common data model and interaction rules engine enable the same infrastructure to handle various interaction types (reactions, comments, shares) across news feeds, profiles, and groups, eliminating the need for separate mechanisms in each application and reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The interaction mechanism is segmented into independent modular components including a data model layer, interaction rules engine, and platform-specific adaptation layer. This segmentation allows the core interaction logic to be reused across applications while permitting customization at the adaptation layer, thereby maintaining versatility without proportionally increasing resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If different interaction mechanisms are used across multiple applications, then each application can have customized interaction functionality, but management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomized interaction functionalityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary interaction rules engine that mediates between the common data model and platform-specific implementations. This intermediary layer standardizes interaction handling across applications, providing a unified management interface while allowing platform-specific adaptations, thereby reducing management complexity without sacrificing customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

A universal data model and interaction rules framework serves all applications, enabling centralized management of interaction mechanisms. The same core infrastructure manages interactions across news feeds, profiles, groups, and other platforms, significantly reducing management complexity compared to maintaining separate mechanisms for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If application-specific interaction mechanisms are implemented, then interaction functionality can be tailored to each application, but user confusion increases due to inconsistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction functionalityVSAvoiduser consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enforces homogeneity in the core interaction data model and rules across all applications, ensuring that fundamental interaction behaviors (how reactions work, how comments are posted) remain consistent. This homogeneity in the core layer prevents user confusion while allowing platform-specific variations in presentation through the adaptation layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing platform-specific customization at the user interface and adaptation layer while maintaining uniformity in the core interaction logic. Each platform can tailor the look and feel of interactions to its specific context, but the underlying behavior remains consistent, providing both customization and user familiarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If redundant interaction mechanisms are maintained across applications, then each application can operate independently, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication independenceVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges redundant interaction mechanisms into a single shared infrastructure comprising a common data model, interaction rules engine, and centralized management system. Multiple applications share this unified infrastructure, dramatically reducing resource consumption while maintaining application independence through configurable adaptation layers that allow each application to operate autonomously within the shared framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260037106A1Common Interaction Architecture
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 SERVICENOW INC
  • US20260037106A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037106A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037106A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment may involve obtaining a first content interaction indicator that indicates a first user interaction with content of a first application, and obtaining a second content interaction indicator that indicates a second user interaction with content of a second application different from the first application, obtaining a set of content interaction rules associated with the first and second applications, and, in response to determining, based on the first and second content interaction rules, that each of the first and second user interactions satisfies the set of content interaction rules, generating display instructions for displaying the first and second user interactions.