Interaction Transcript Lifecycle Rules Using Adaptive Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interaction lifecycle management systems rely on static rules that fail to adapt dynamically to changing conditions and customer interactions, leading to inefficiencies, storage inefficiencies, and potential loss of crucial data due to inflexible retention policies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatically generating and updating lifecycle rules for interaction transcripts using machine learning, allowing real-time decision-making based on interaction data and metadata, ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If static rules are used for managing interaction transcripts, then implementation simplicity is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transforming static lifecycle rules into dynamic rules that automatically adapt to changing conditions. The system generates dynamic rules based on interaction data patterns, allowing the rule set to evolve without manual intervention. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining implementation simplicity through automated rule generation while achieving adaptability through data-driven rule updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically generating and updating lifecycle rules without requiring manual configuration. The rule generation engine analyzes interaction data and autonomously creates appropriate lifecycle management rules, eliminating the need for continuous manual rule adjustments while maintaining high adaptability to different interaction scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If static rules are used for managing interaction transcripts, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddata retention accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously analyzing interaction data and using the insights to generate and refine lifecycle rules. This closed-loop approach ensures that retention policies are continuously optimized based on actual data patterns, preventing information loss while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated feedback-driven rule adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The rule generation engine performs self-service by automatically analyzing interaction data and creating appropriate retention rules without manual intervention. This self-configuring capability ensures accurate data retention based on actual usage patterns while keeping system complexity low through automated rule generation rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic rule generation is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves the complexity increase through self-service automation. The rule generation engine automatically analyzes interaction data, determines appropriate lifecycle rules, and implements them without manual configuration. This automation handles the inherent complexity of dynamic rule generation internally, presenting a simple interface to users while achieving high adaptability through data-driven rule creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If dynamic rule generation is implemented, then loss of information is reduced, but productivity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retention accuracyVSAvoidprocessing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rule generation engine performs self-service by automatically analyzing interaction data and generating retention rules without manual intervention. This automation reduces information loss through continuous data-driven optimization while managing productivity requirements by handling rule generation autonomously, requiring only initial system setup and ongoing data input rather than continuous manual rule management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250267216A1System and method for managing interaction transcripts
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 NICE LTD
  • US20250267216A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267216A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267216A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for managing interaction transcripts based on rules may include a computing device; a memory; and a processor, the processor configured to: identify one or more decision parameters in an interaction transcript; determine at least one decision category for a rule from the one or more decision parameters; calculate probabilities for the at least one decision category for the rule using the one or more decision parameters; and apply the rule by selecting one or more action categories for the interaction transcript based on the calculated probabilities for the at least one decision category.