Interactive Analytics Workflow for Evidence-Based Hypothesis Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing analytic systems often discard relevant data and exacerbate biases, leading to erroneous or suboptimal conclusions, which can have catastrophic results in fields like security and medical treatment.

Innovation Solution

An interactive structured analytic system that includes a display, analytics application, and modules for generating queries, evaluating data, and assessing hypotheses, allowing users to select and confirm evidence, thereby offsetting cognitive biases and ensuring relevant data is considered.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If filters are used to remove irrelevant data, then data relevance is improved, but relevant data is removed and analysis accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata relevanceVSAvoidanalysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements an iterative feedback loop where users review and correct filter results, and the system learns from these corrections to improve future filtering. The feedback mechanism allows users to mark relevant data as irrelevant and vice versa, enabling the system to refine its filtering algorithms continuously, thus maintaining both data relevance and analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts filtering parameters based on user interactions and data characteristics. By changing filter sensitivity thresholds and inclusion criteria in response to user feedback and analysis context, the system optimizes the balance between removing irrelevant data and preserving relevant data, resolving the contradiction between data relevance and analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If filters are used to remove irrelevant data, then processing efficiency is improved, but cognitive biases are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcognitive biases
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated filtering that acts as a mediator between raw data and user analysis. This intermediary filter systematically removes obviously irrelevant data while preserving ambiguous or potentially relevant data for user review, thereby maintaining processing efficiency while preventing cognitive biases from influencing the initial data selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to perform self-correction of filter results, allowing them to override automated filtering decisions. This self-service mechanism empowers users to recognize and correct biased filtering while maintaining the efficiency benefits of automated processing, as users only need to intervene when the automated filter makes errors or introduces biases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If automated analysis is used, then analysis speed is improved, but user control over data selection is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis speedVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control where the level of automation adjusts based on user needs and data complexity. Users can switch between fully automated analysis mode for speed and interactive manual review mode for control, or combine both by having the system pre-filter data and then allowing user review of specific items. This dynamic adjustability resolves the contradiction between analysis speed and user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the data processing task into automated preliminary filtering and user-specific review phases. The automated component handles bulk data processing and obvious filtering, while users focus only on reviewing and validating specific data items that require human judgment, thus maintaining both speed through automation and control through selective user involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260064677A1Interactive Structured Analytic Systems
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 RESILIENT COGNITIVE SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20260064677A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064677A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064677A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An analytics system can include a display on which a plurality of images are shown, and an analytics application communicably coupled to the display. The analytics application can receive a question and hypotheses from a user using the display. The analytics application can also generate queries using a natural language module, and send the queries to a plurality of data sources. The analytics application can further receive data from the data sources in response to the queries, and evaluate the data to generate evaluated data. The analytics application can also present the evaluated data, and receive a selection of at least one data item of the evaluated data. The analytics application can further convert the at least one data item into evidence, receive a selection of the evidence applied to a hypothesis, and evaluate the hypothesis. The analytics application can also present an assessment that the hypothesis answers the question.