Interactive Credit Card Application System Using Partner Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional credit card application methods are limited in obtaining sufficient information about applicants with limited or no credit history and fail to capture credit interests or partner-affinity data, leading to suboptimal credit decision processes.

Innovation Solution

An online interactive and partner-enhanced credit card application system that uses dynamic tree-type questions and partner-supplied data, incorporating statistical modeling techniques to facilitate credit decisions, optimize product offers, and generate revenue through targeted incentives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional mail-in or on-line application methods are used, then the application process is simple and static, but insufficient information is obtained about applicants with limited or no credit history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidapplication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic application process using tree-type questioning where the sequence and content of questions adapt based on applicant responses. This dynamic structure allows the system to probe deeper into specific areas (employment, financial, lifestyle) only when relevant, thereby obtaining comprehensive information about applicants with limited credit history without presenting a static, overly complex form to all applicants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The application process is segmented into multiple modular components including tree-type questioning branches, partner data integration modules, and statistical modeling layers. This segmentation allows information gathering to be divided into manageable segments (employment verification, financial assessment, lifestyle preferences) that can be processed independently and recombined to form a complete applicant profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If traditional non-interactive application forms are used, then the process is straightforward, but credit interests and partner affinity data cannot be captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit interest dataVSAvoidapplication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables applicants to self-disclose their credit interests, lifestyle preferences, and partner affinities through interactive questioning and optional partner network data sharing. Applicants actively provide this information through the tree-type interface and by authorizing data sharing with partners, making the information gathering self-service rather than requiring manual extraction by credit analysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The interactive application process provides immediate feedback to applicants about their credit profile status, approval likelihood, and personalized product recommendations based on their responses. This feedback loop encourages applicants to provide complete and accurate information about their credit interests and preferences, as they can see the direct impact on their application outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If static questionnaire formats are used, then the application process is consistent and easy to manage, but risks associated with applicants from different partners cannot be reflected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit decision reliabilityVSAvoidpartner-specific adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the application assessment to each applicant's specific partner context. Different partners (employers, banks, professional organizations) provide partner-specific data that is integrated into the credit decision model, allowing the system to assess risks and creditworthiness differently for applicants from different partners based on partner-specific reliability metrics and data quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The credit decision model dynamically adjusts assessment parameters and weighting factors based on the applicant's partner identity and the quality/relevance of partner-supplied data. Statistical modeling techniques modify the evaluation parameters in real-time to reflect the specific risk profile and data characteristics associated with different partner sources, enhancing both reliability and partner-specific adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If conventional credit decision methods are used, then the process is standardized, but approval rates and account mix cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapproval rateVSAvoiddecision system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical credit decision-making (manual review of static forms) with automated statistical modeling and machine learning algorithms. These computational models process the dynamic data collected through tree-type questioning and partner integrations to automatically generate credit decisions, optimizing approval rates and account mix through data-driven insights rather than standardized mechanical processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary statistical modeling and risk assessment during the application process itself, using the data collected through interactive questioning to pre-evaluate creditworthiness before final decision-making. This preliminary action allows the system to identify high-probability approval candidates early and tailor product offers accordingly, improving overall approval rates while maintaining rigorous risk standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8489497B1Online interactive and partner-enhanced credit card
Publication Date: 2013.07.16 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US8489497B1 patent drawing
  • US8489497B1 patent drawing
  • US8489497B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An on-line interactive and partner-enhanced credit card application system is disclosed. The system utilizes partner-supplied data of an applicant in credit decision. The system structures an on-line credit card application interactively with a tree-type series of questions and answers such that the next set of questions are based on the answers given. The system offers an appropriate bounty to a partner by the credit card issuer based on the data supplied by the partner and obtained during the interactive questions and answers. The system enables a credit card issuer to make an optimum product offer such as pricing and credit line assignment. The system offers commercial incentives, and utilizes the partner-supplied data during a statement process to generate further revenue and ensure cardholder retention.