Interactive Electronic Handwriting Editing with Dynamic Text Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic document editing technologies limit interactive editing of electronic handwriting, requiring users to convert all content to text form, making it difficult to maintain a natural flow and allowing only static or fully converted handwriting.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives electronic handwriting, generates textual interpretations, scores potential placements within existing content, and dynamically updates the document to include the selected handwriting representation, allowing for interactive editing and maintaining a natural flow between text and handwriting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic handwriting is permanently displayed or converted entirely to character-based content, then the document maintains a stable text form, but the user cannot easily edit or correct handwriting mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument stabilityVSAvoidediting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between handwriting display mode and text conversion mode based on user interaction and confidence levels. Handwriting segments remain editable and can be converted to text on demand, allowing the document to adapt its state rather than being static in either handwriting or text form

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state parameter of handwriting segments from 'editable handwriting' to 'converted text' based on confidence scores and user preferences. This parameter change allows flexible editing while maintaining document stability, as conversions are selective and reversible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If all content is converted to computer-based text form, then the document is easily editable, but the natural flow and creativity of handwriting is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting capabilityVSAvoidhandwriting expression freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different segments of the document have different qualities - some are converted to text for ease of editing, while others remain as handwriting to preserve natural flow and creativity. The system selectively applies conversion based on local characteristics like confidence level, user preference, and segment importance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The document is segmented into convertible portions and non-convertible portions. Handwriting segments are processed individually, allowing selective conversion of specific segments while preserving others in their original handwriting form, maintaining both editability and handwriting expression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If electronic handwriting is used for freeform mixed layouts, then creativity and placement flexibility are encouraged, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout flexibilityVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of handwriting segments to determine convertibility before full processing. By pre-assessing confidence levels and segment characteristics, the system avoids unnecessary complex processing of segments that will remain as handwriting, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11983945B2Interactive editing of electronic text
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11983945B2 patent drawing
  • US11983945B2 patent drawing
  • US11983945B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new segment of electronic handwriting is provided to a handwriting recognition module to obtain a plurality of textual interpretations of the new segment. The textual interpretations obtained from the handwriting recognition module are scored based on how each respective electronic handwriting representation would change a display of existing electronic content when the respective electronic handwriting representation is displayed substantially at the user designated position within or adjacent to the existing electronic content. Based on the scoring, an electronic handwriting representation corresponding to a respective textual interpretation of the plurality of textual interpretations is selected, and the existing electronic content is modified to include the selected electronic handwriting representation located substantially at the user designated position.