Interactive Input System Gesture Recognition Bezel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interactive input systems are not commonly used in residential environments for consumer electronic devices, as they require users to be within arm's reach and are not compatible with the common practice of interacting with devices at a distance, leading to issues with remote control units being cumbersome, prone to loss, and requiring complex programming.

Innovation Solution

An interactive input system that includes an imaging structure and processing structure capable of detecting user touch input and gesture input, allowing for control of appliances in both touch input and gesture input modes, with cameras capturing images of a touch surface and a region beyond to enable remote gesture recognition and conversion into commands for appliances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a touch screen system is used, then user interaction precision is improved, but user accessibility distance is limited to arm's reach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction precisionVSAvoiduser accessibility distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the interaction space from a 2D touch surface to a 3D gesture recognition volume by positioning cameras at multiple corners of the bezel. This allows the system to detect gestures in air space beyond the touch screen surface, enabling users to interact from a distance while maintaining precise input capability through spatial coordinate mapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple remote control units are provided for different devices, then device control versatility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice control versatilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control system where a single interactive input device with gesture recognition capability can control multiple different consumer electronic devices. The system detects gestures in the air space and translates them into device-specific commands, eliminating the need for multiple specialized remote controls while maintaining the ability to operate various devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If gesture recognition is added to touch screen system, then user interaction flexibility is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction flexibilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the gesture recognition function into separate camera modules positioned at each corner of the bezel, with each camera independently capturing images of the air space. The processing system then integrates data from these segmented camera inputs to recognize gestures, distributing the processing complexity across multiple independent components rather than requiring a single complex processing unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8487881B2Interactive input system, controller therefor and method of controlling an appliance
Publication Date: 2013.07.16 SMART TECH INC (CA)
  • US8487881B2 patent drawing
  • US8487881B2 patent drawing
  • US8487881B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interactive input system comprises a consumer electronic device and a controller for the consumer electronic device. The controller is operable in one of a touch input mode and a gesture input mode and controls the consumer electronic device in response to one of the detected user touch input and user gesture input depending on the operating mode of the controller.