Interactive MIMO Controller Tuning via Segmented SISO Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional H∞ synthesis techniques for designing multiple input multiple output (MIMO) controllers are cumbersome, non-intuitive, and computationally expensive, making them undesirable for interactive design applications, as they treat the controller as a black box and do not support real-time operation or typical design workflows.

Innovation Solution

The approach allows users to treat the controller as a white box with a block diagonal structure, using non-smooth H∞ optimizers to automatically tune arbitrary MIMO control structures, enabling interactive MIMO tuning with scalable solutions for systems of any complexity, and supports nonlinear control design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional H∞ synthesis techniques are used for designing MIMO controllers, then the controller design achieves robustness and stability, but the design process becomes cumbersome, computationally expensive, and non-interactive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller robustnessVSAvoiddesign efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the MIMO controller design into independent SISO loop shaping problems. By decomposing the multi-input multi-output system into multiple single-input single-output loops, each loop can be designed independently using intuitive frequency response methods, eliminating the computational burden of conventional H∞ synthesis while maintaining robustness through structured singular value analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by starting with intuitive SISO loop shaping specifications and then systematically constructing the MIMO controller from these simplified designs, rather than beginning with complex MIMO H∞ optimization. This inversion makes the design process interactive and computationally efficient while preserving robustness through the structured controller architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If conventional H∞ synthesis techniques are used, then controller robustness is achieved, but the controller is treated as a black box making it non-intuitive for users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller robustnessVSAvoiddesign intuitiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controller design into visible, manipulable SISO loops that engineers can intuitively shape using frequency response techniques. Each loop's gain and phase characteristics can be independently adjusted and visualized, making the design process transparent and intuitive while the underlying structured controller architecture ensures robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs graphical user interfaces that visually represent loop shapes, gain margins, and phase margins with color-coded displays. This visual feedback mechanism allows users to intuitively understand controller behavior and make informed design decisions, transforming the abstract black-box H∞ synthesis into a transparent, visual design process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Reliability

If conventional H∞ synthesis techniques are used, then optimal control performance is achieved, but real-time operation and interactive design are not supported

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controller tuning process into independent SISO loops that can be rapidly adjusted without requiring full MIMO optimization computations. This segmentation enables real-time interactive tuning where engineers can immediately see the effects of parameter changes on individual loops, dramatically reducing tuning time while maintaining optimal control performance through the structured controller framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary loop shaping for each SISO loop independently before final MIMO synthesis. This preliminary action establishes intuitive baseline designs that can be quickly adjusted in real-time, avoiding the need for computationally intensive iterative MIMO optimization during interactive design sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9026233B2Interactive control of multiple input multiple output control structures
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 MATHWORKS INC
  • US9026233B2 patent drawing
  • US9026233B2 patent drawing
  • US9026233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments allow users to interactively formulate and solve multivariable feedback control problems. For example, users can solve problems where a plurality of control elements are distributed over one or more feedback loops and need to be jointly tuned to optimize overall performance and robustness of a control system. Embodiments allow users to specify design requirements and objectives in formats familiar to the user. Embodiments can operate on tunable parameters to solve the control problem in a manner that satisfies the design requirements and/or objectives provided by the user.