Interactive Policy Evaluation System for RSOP Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Administrators face challenges in determining the impact of complex policies on user groups due to limitations in existing Resultant Set of Policy (RSOP) tools, which lack interactive functionality and dynamic generation capabilities, making it difficult to manage user access effectively across multiple resources.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for interactive policy evaluation using a graphical user interface that receives descriptions of clients, resources, and access methods, and simulates policy applications to display applicable policies and decisions, enabling administrators to modify filters and policies interactively and generate dynamic resultant sets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If administrators use manual login as each user to determine policy impact, then they can obtain accurate policy evaluation results, but the time consumption and operational complexity become unmanageable for large user groups

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a virtual copy of the user environment and policy application logic to simulate policy evaluation results without actually logging in as each user. The policy simulation engine replicates the policy evaluation process programmatically, providing accurate results for large numbers of users instantaneously rather than requiring manual verification for each user account.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of logging in as each user with an automated computational system. The policy simulation engine uses software-based policy evaluation that automatically applies policies to virtual user scenarios, substituting human administrative effort with algorithmic processing that can handle large user groups efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If administrators use conventional RSOP tools to preview policy results, then they can obtain a list of available resources, but the tools lack interactive functionality and fail to provide comprehensive information about policy determination logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidinteractive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements interactive feedback mechanisms where administrators can input hypothetical user scenarios and immediately receive policy evaluation results. The interface allows administrators to modify user attributes, resources, or policy parameters and observe how changes affect policy outcomes. This bidirectional interaction provides both comprehensive information about policy logic and ease of experimentation with different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a policy simulation engine as an intermediary between the administrator and the actual policy enforcement system. This intermediary layer allows administrators to query and explore policy behavior in a safe, controlled environment without affecting real user access. The simulator mediates between hypothetical scenarios and policy evaluation, providing detailed explanations of how policies are applied and why certain resources are granted or denied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple RSOP tools are used to cover different resources, then comprehensive resource coverage can be achieved, but the system complexity and difficulty of integration increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource coverageVSAvoidtool integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal policy simulation engine that can evaluate policies across multiple resource types through a single unified interface. Rather than requiring separate RSOP tools for different resources, the system implements a multi-functional engine that adapts to various resource scenarios through configurable parameters. This single tool provides comprehensive resource coverage while maintaining consistent interaction patterns and information presentation across all resource types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8775944B2Methods and systems for interactive evaluation of policies
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 CITRIX SYSTEMS INC
  • US8775944B2 patent drawing
  • US8775944B2 patent drawing
  • US8775944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for interactive evaluation of policies includes a first graphical user interface element and a second graphical user interface element. The first graphical user interface element enumerates at least one resource. The second graphical user interface element receives an identification of a characteristic of at least one client and displays a result of an application of at least one policy associated with the at least one resource to the at least one client, the at least on policy applied responsive to the received identification of the characteristic.