Interactive Segmentation with Spatial Constraint for Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interactive image segmentation methods face challenges with insufficient user-marked training samples, leading to over-fitting and poor predictive performance, especially when applying locally-learned models globally.

Innovation Solution

An integrated interactive segmentation method that combines supervised learning and statistical analysis, defines a local mask based on user inputs, and optimizes a cost function using pixel-wise multiplication and graph cuts, limiting processing to a local area and incorporating edge detection information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If supervised learning is used with limited user-marked training samples, then the model can be trained quickly, but over-fitting occurs and predictive performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidpredictive performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (spatial constraint model and local mask) between the limited training samples and the global prediction task. The spatial constraint model learns from user-marked samples and generates local masks that guide the prediction process, acting as a mediator that bridges the gap between insufficient training data and reliable global predictions, thereby reducing over-fitting while maintaining training efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the prediction process into local regions guided by spatial constraints and user marks. Instead of training a single global model on limited samples, the system divides the image into local areas around user marks, trains local models or generates local masks for each region, and combines them for global prediction. This segmentation allows each local model to learn from sufficient local samples while contributing to accurate global predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a global model is trained on user-marked samples, then predictions can be made across the entire image, but the model fails to capture local context and prediction accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal prediction capabilityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the prediction model adaptive to different spatial locations. The spatial constraint model generates location-specific local masks that reflect local context and characteristics. Each region of the image receives predictions guided by its own local constraints and user marks, rather than applying a uniform global model, thereby capturing local context while maintaining global coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the prediction process adaptive and flexible across different regions. The local masks and spatial constraints are dynamically generated based on user marks and local image characteristics, allowing the model to adapt its prediction behavior to different areas of the image rather than applying a static global model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If loose user marks (strokes) are accepted as input, then ease of operation improves, but precision of boundary definition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking convenienceVSAvoidboundary definition precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the system to automatically refine loose user marks into precise boundary definitions. Users provide convenient stroke-based marks, and the spatial constraint model automatically processes these marks to generate precise local masks and segmentation boundaries without requiring users to manually define exact boundaries, thereby achieving both ease of operation and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9202281B2Integrated interactive segmentation with spatial constraint for digital image analysis
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US9202281B2 patent drawing
  • US9202281B2 patent drawing
  • US9202281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated interactive segmentation with spatial constraint method utilizes a combination of several of the most popular online learning algorithms into one and implements a spatial constraint which defines a valid mask local to the user's given marks. Additionally, both supervised learning and statistical analysis are integrated, which are able to compensate each other. Once prediction and activation are obtained, pixel-wised multiplication is conducted to fully indicate how likely each pixel belongs to the foreground or background.