Interactive 3D Printing Support Structure Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing methods often result in suboptimal surface quality due to inadequate support structure placement, which can lead to damage and deformation, especially for inexperienced users who lack the expertise to manually adjust support layouts effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for interactively designing support structures for 3D printed objects, allowing users to input desired surface quality preferences, which automatically determines optimal support layouts and printing orientations, thereby improving surface finish and user convenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated support structure design is used, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport structure design efficiencyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different support densities to different regions of the model based on local surface quality requirements. Users can specify high-quality regions where supports should be minimized and low-quality regions where supports can be denser, allowing automated design while maintaining local surface quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure design is made adaptive and adjustable. The system allows users to modify support parameters dynamically based on desired outcomes, and the automated system recalculates the support layout accordingly, providing both automation and precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of support structures is performed, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidsupport structure design time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of support structures based on user-defined surface quality parameters. The automated algorithm independently calculates optimal support locations and densities, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustments while maintaining high precision through user-guided parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If excessive supports are used, then reliability is improved, but object-generated harmful factors worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsurface blemishes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system places supports selectively in regions where they are structurally necessary while avoiding regions where they would cause surface blemishes. By analyzing the model's geometry and identifying critical support zones, the system maintains reliability without creating harmful surface artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes supports from regions where they would cause surface damage. By separating the structural support function from surface-contact regions, the system maintains reliability while eliminating harmful surface effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If insufficient supports are used, then object-generated harmful factors are reduced, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface blemishesVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system concentrates supports in specific local regions where structural integrity is critical, rather than distributing them uniformly. This localized support strategy maintains reliability in critical areas while minimizing surface contact in non-critical regions, reducing harmful surface effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11639023B2Interactive design tool for varying density support structures
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 XEROX CORP
  • US11639023B2 patent drawing
  • US11639023B2 patent drawing
  • US11639023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for interactively designing a support structure for a three-dimensionally printed object having user-defined surface quality, the system including a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable medium communicatively coupled to the processor and storing instructions executable by the processor is provided. When executed, the instructions cause the processor perform operations including receiving a digital model of the object to be three-dimensionally printed, receiving user input related to a desired surface quality at one or more portions of the digital model, determining a printing orientation of the object based on the digital model and the user input; determining a support layout for the object, based on the printing orientation and the user input, and transmitting the support layout, the printing orientation, and the digital model to a three-dimensional printer.