Interactive Text Summary System for Document Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional text synthesis systems face challenges in accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility when extracting information from digital documents, often producing imprecise and irrelevant summaries due to a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to consider user objectives and limitations in handling varying document scopes and portions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage system that generates structured text summaries by automatically creating document tags, identifying corresponding document segments, and modifying them based on user input, using an interactive graphical user interface to ensure accuracy and relevance, allowing for flexible operation across diverse digital content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional systems use a one-size-fits-all approach to extract information from digital documents, then the system complexity is reduced, but the accuracy and relevance of extracted information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of extracted information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operation mode between automatic and interactive based on user needs. The interactive mode allows users to provide feedback and refine document segments, while automatic mode provides quick initial processing. This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to be simple when speed is needed and precise when accuracy is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users can review, modify, and provide corrections to automatically extracted document segments. This feedback loop continuously improves the accuracy of information extraction while maintaining system efficiency through automated initial processing, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems are designed to be generic and work across all document types, then the adaptability is improved, but the precision and depth of extraction for specific domains deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different document typesVSAvoidprecision of extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed as a multi-functional platform that can process various document types (technical papers, medical records, legal documents, etc.) through a common architecture. It achieves domain-specific precision through configurable parameters, interactive refinement, and domain-adaptive processing modes while maintaining universal applicability across different document formats and types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing strategies and extraction depths to different sections and types of documents based on their specific characteristics. It identifies and applies domain-specific extraction rules to relevant portions of documents while using general-purpose methods for other sections, thus achieving both versatility and domain-specific precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If conventional systems extract comprehensive information from entire digital documents, then the completeness of information is improved, but the efficiency and user relevance deteriorates due to processing unnecessary portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of extracted informationVSAvoidefficiency of information extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments digital documents into meaningful sections (abstract, introduction, methodology, results, conclusion, etc.) and processes each segment according to its specific characteristics and relevance. This segmentation allows the system to extract comprehensive information from necessary portions while skipping or lightly processing less relevant sections, thus improving efficiency without sacrificing completeness of essential information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial action by extracting detailed information only from critical document sections that are most relevant to user objectives, while using summary-level extraction for less critical portions. This selective depth of processing maintains completeness of essential information while significantly improving processing efficiency by avoiding exhaustive analysis of entire documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of information

If conventional systems provide detailed and comprehensive text summaries, then the completeness of information is improved, but the ease of operation and user accessibility deteriorates due to complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of summaryVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of summary detail based on user preferences, document type, and processing mode. Users can select between quick summary mode (high ease of operation, selective completeness) and detailed analysis mode (comprehensive completeness, more complex interaction). This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing users to choose their preferred balance between completeness and ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system presents summarized information in segmented, organized sections rather than as a single comprehensive block. This segmentation makes detailed information more accessible and easier to navigate, improving ease of operation while maintaining completeness through structured presentation of all relevant summary elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11222167B2Generating structured text summaries of digital documents using interactive collaboration
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 ADOBE INC
  • US11222167B2 patent drawing
  • US11222167B2 patent drawing
  • US11222167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes one or more embodiments of a structured text summary system that generates structured text summaries of digital documents based on an interactive graphical user interface. For example, the structured text summary system can collaborate with users to create structured text summaries of a digital document based on automatically generating document tags corresponding to the digital document, determining segments of the digital document that correspond to a selected document tag, and generating structured text summaries for those document segments.