Interactive Training Simulators Using Physical Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current simulation models require significant time, resources, and specialized skills to build and modify, often lacking real-time adjustability and collaborative capabilities, which limits their effectiveness and user engagement in business, education, and entertainment applications.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing physical nodes and a display screen for real-time interaction with mathematical models, allowing users to adjust parameters without specialized tools or programming knowledge, enabling distributed and collaborative simulations across multiple platforms using common software and hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If specialized hardware and software are used to build system models, then modeling precision and simulation reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by enabling a single physical board to serve multiple functions: it can model different systems (ecosystems, supply chains, traffic flows) by changing the configuration of physical nodes and their connections, eliminating the need for specialized hardware for each simulation type while maintaining high reliability through consistent physical interaction mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating physical representations (nodes) that replicate system components. These physical nodes copy the essential characteristics and relationships of real-world systems, allowing users to interact with tangible copies rather than complex specialized hardware, thereby reducing device complexity while preserving simulation reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If manual software interfaces are used to modify system components, then modeling precision is maintained, but productivity and ease of operation decrease due to time-consuming adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling precisionVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by allowing the physical node configuration to automatically define the system model structure and parameters. When users physically arrange nodes and connect them, the system automatically interprets this configuration to generate the corresponding mathematical model, eliminating the need for manual software programming while maintaining modeling precision through the structured physical-to-digital mapping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional software-based modeling systems are used, then adaptability to different systems is achieved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to required programming knowledge and syntax learning

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/cognitive system of learning programming syntax with a physical manipulation system. Users interact with tangible nodes that can be moved, connected, and configured physically, substituting the need for coding knowledge with intuitive spatial reasoning and hands-on assembly, thereby maintaining adaptability while dramatically improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If physical nodes are introduced for real-time interaction, then ease of operation and user engagement improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The physical nodes serve multiple functions: they represent system components, enable user interaction, define model structure through their positions and connections, and trigger simulations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized devices for each function, thereby improving ease of operation while limiting the increase in overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240233576A9Method for rendering mathematical models of systems into interactive training simulators
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 MALONE TERRY L
  • US20240233576A9 patent drawing
  • US20240233576A9 patent drawing
  • US20240233576A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for rendering interactive simulations is provided. The system includes an interactive display screen and one or more physical nodes to which users can selectively assign values. The interactive display screen is enabled to provide a visual representation of a simulation for a systemic model which may be driven by one or more mathematical equations. Each model, by way of one or more mathematical equations, has one or more parameters. The interactive display screen is enabled to define one or more node location for each parameter. The interactive display screen provides one-way communication via each node location. As a result, when a node is physically placed on a node location, the one-way communication assigns or configures that node to a simulation parameter. The user may then select a value for that simulation parameter, which in turn influences the simulation being represented on the interactive display screen.