Interactive UAV Video Broadcasting With Safe Control Hub Mediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current UAV live video broadcasting systems lack interactive options, diminishing viewer experience and reducing the usefulness of UAVs in applications such as surveillance and logistics, as viewers cannot influence the video capture perspective or interact with the UAVs safely.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for managing live video broadcasts from multiple UAVs, allowing user input to interact with and control the video streaming, including processing user instructions to adjust the video broadcast in real-time, ensuring safe operation and immersive viewer experience through a control hub that receives and processes user inputs to coordinate UAV operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If UAVs are operated in a coordinated manner with multiple viewers, then the viewer experience and interactivity are improved, but the system complexity and safety management become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewer interaction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A control hub is introduced as an intermediary component between multiple UAVs and multiple viewers. The control hub receives user inputs from viewing ends, processes them according to safety rules and coordination algorithms, and transmits processed commands to the appropriate broadcasting ends. This mediator architecture enables complex multi-to-many interactions while maintaining system manageability and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into distinct functional modules: broadcasting ends (UAVs with cameras), viewing ends (user devices), and a central control hub. Each module has specialized responsibilities, allowing independent optimization and management. The control hub further segments the coordination task by handling different aspects separately: receiving inputs, processing commands, and transmitting outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If users can interact with and control UAV video capture perspectives, then the immersive experience is improved, but the safety and operational control become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction easeVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control hub implements a feedback mechanism where user inputs are received, processed against safety rules and operational constraints, and the results are transmitted back to both the UAVs and the users. This closed-loop feedback system ensures that user interactions are continuously monitored and adjusted to maintain safety while enabling ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control hub performs preliminary processing of user inputs before they reach the UAVs. Safety rules, coordination algorithms, and operational constraints are applied in advance to filter and validate user commands. This preliminary action prevents unsafe operations from reaching the UAVs, ensuring reliability before execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multiple UAVs broadcast live video simultaneously, then the content variety and viewer engagement are improved, but the bandwidth requirements and system coordination increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo broadcast capacityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control hub implements selective broadcasting where not all UAVs transmit video streams simultaneously to all viewers. Instead, the system processes user inputs and determines which UAV broadcasts should be active based on current viewing demands and coordination requirements. This partial action approach reduces overall bandwidth consumption while maintaining sufficient broadcast capacity for engaged users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10944998B2Systems and methods for UAV interactive video broadcasting
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 SZ DJI TECH CO LTD
  • US10944998B2 patent drawing
  • US10944998B2 patent drawing
  • US10944998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, and methods are provided herein for UAV video broadcasting. A method for video broadcasting may comprise: receiving broadcast data from a broadcasting end, wherein the broadcast data comprises video data collected by a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and wherein said UAVs are configured to be (1) operated in a coordinated manner and (2) in communication with one or more ground stations; receiving a user input from a viewing end, wherein the user input comprises one or more instructions configured for interacting with the broadcasting end; processing the user input from the viewing end; and transmitting the processed user input to the broadcasting end to adjust video broadcasting at the broadcasting end.