Interbody Implant Fixation With Deployable Teeth and Locked Position

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orthopedic implants face challenges in achieving sufficient fixation and load transfer between vertebral bodies, leading to inadequate bone growth and potential expulsion due to insufficient contact area and micro-motions, especially in cases of low bone mineral density or aggressive discectomies.

Innovation Solution

The development of an interbody implant system with deployable teeth and a locking mechanism, utilizing additive manufacturing to create patient-specific designs that enhance fixation by deploying teeth after implantation for secure engagement with vertebral bodies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If standard size implants are used, then ease of manufacture and inventory management are improved, but fixation strength and load transfer are insufficient leading to implant expulsion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestandard implant productionVSAvoidfixation strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from fixed standard implant sizes to variable custom-fit dimensions. The implant system enables adjustment of length, width, and curvature parameters to match patient-specific anatomy, thereby optimizing fixation strength and load transfer while preventing implant expulsion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating implants with site-specific properties tailored to each patient's unique anatomy. The custom-fit design allows different regions of the implant to have optimized characteristics for local bone density, curvature, and contact area requirements, improving overall fixation strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If larger contact area is provided, then load transfer and fixation are improved, but device complexity and insertion difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact areaVSAvoidinsertion complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by incorporating a deployment mechanism that transforms the implant from a compact insertion configuration to an expanded fixation configuration. The implant is inserted in a low-profile state and then deployed in situ to achieve maximum contact area, simplifying the insertion process while maintaining large surface area for load transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting by designing the implant to be contained within an insertion device or delivery system. The implant is nested in a compressed or folded state during insertion, then deployed to its full expanded configuration to provide large contact area with the vertebral bodies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If micro-motions are minimized, then bone growth is promoted, but fixation mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone growth reliabilityVSAvoidfixation mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the fixation function into multiple independent elements such as anterior and posterior teeth, lateral wings, or modular fixation features. These segmented elements work together to distribute and minimize micro-motions across the implant-bone interface, promoting bone growth without requiring a single complex fixation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If patient-specific designs are created, then fixation and load transfer are enhanced, but manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing patient-specific planning and design before the surgical procedure. Imaging data is collected and used to create a custom implant design in advance, allowing time for manufacturing while the patient is being prepared for surgery. This eliminates delays during the surgical procedure itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by using patient-specific anatomical measurements to define implant dimensions, curvature, and fixation feature locations. These parameters are determined through preoperative imaging and planning, enabling custom-fit implants that optimize fixation strength while streamlining the manufacturing process through parametric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12491085B2Systems and methods for orthopedic implant fixation
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 CARLSMED INC
  • US12491085B2 patent drawing
  • US12491085B2 patent drawing
  • US12491085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interbody implant system for use in the spine includes a base comprising two or more bone contacting surfaces, at least one recess in at least one of the two or more bone contacting surfaces, the recess configured for containing a tooth, a deployable tooth to provide fixation between the base and the anatomy of a subject, a break-away bridge between the tooth and the base for providing a first relative position between the tooth and the base, and a locking mechanism for providing a second relative position between the tooth and the base.