Interchangeable Circuit Breaker Poles Using Universal Kinematic Couplings
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current low-voltage circuit breakers require separate design and manufacturing processes for poles in free air and sealed poles, limiting manufacturing flexibility and increasing costs due to the lack of interchangeable components and standardized parts.
Innovation Solution
A modular low-voltage circuit breaker design that allows for easy conversion between poles in free air and sealed poles using a single control mechanism and interchangeable kinematic couplings, enabling compatibility with both types of poles and reducing the number of required parts for assembly and maintenance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If separate design and manufacturing processes are used for poles in free air and sealed poles, then each pole type can be optimized for its specific application, but manufacturing flexibility is limited and costs increase due to lack of interchangeable components
Solution Approach 1:
The control mechanism is designed with universal compatibility to work with both sealed poles and poles in free air. The kinematic coupling system uses standardized interfaces that can accommodate different pole types, allowing a single control mechanism to perform multiple functions across different circuit breaker configurations.
Solution Approach 2:
The circuit breaker is divided into modular components: the control mechanism is separated from the poles, and the kinematic coupling is designed as an interchangeable interface. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while maintaining overall system flexibility and interchangeability.
2Reliability
If separate design and manufacturing processes are used for poles in free air and sealed poles, then each pole type can be optimized for its specific application, but manufacturing costs increase due to lack of standardized parts
Solution Approach 1:
The control mechanism and kinematic coupling are designed as universal components that can be used with both sealed and non-sealed poles. This universality reduces the number of unique parts that need to be manufactured, standardized, and inventoried, thereby lowering manufacturing costs while maintaining pole-specific optimization.
Solution Approach 2:
The design allows for parameter changes in the pole configuration (sealed vs. non-sealed) while maintaining the same control mechanism and kinematic coupling interface. This enables manufacturers to produce standardized control components in high volumes while only varying the pole-specific components, reducing overall manufacturing costs.
3Reliability
If separate design and manufacturing processes are used for poles in free air and sealed poles, then each pole type can be optimized for its specific application, but the number of required parts for assembly and maintenance increases
Solution Approach 1:
The control mechanism is designed with universal compatibility to work with both sealed poles and poles in free air. The kinematic coupling system uses standardized interfaces that can accommodate different pole types, allowing a single control mechanism to perform multiple functions across different circuit breaker configurations.
Solution Approach 2:
The circuit breaker is divided into modular components: the control mechanism is separated from the poles, and the kinematic coupling is designed as an interchangeable interface. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while maintaining overall system flexibility and interchangeability.
4Reliability
If separate design and manufacturing processes are used for poles in free air and sealed poles, then each pole type can be optimized for its specific application, but interchangeability of components is limited
Solution Approach 1:
The control mechanism is designed with universal compatibility to work with both sealed poles and poles in free air. The kinematic coupling system uses standardized interfaces that can accommodate different pole types, allowing a single control mechanism to perform multiple functions across different circuit breaker configurations.
Solution Approach 2:
The circuit breaker is divided into modular components: the control mechanism is separated from the poles, and the kinematic coupling is designed as an interchangeable interface. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while maintaining overall system flexibility and interchangeability.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A low-voltage circuit breaker that comprises: a containment structure (2); a control mechanism (3); a plurality of circuit breaking poles (4), chosen between a first type of pole (40) that comprises a first housing (41) containing a first fixed contact (42) and a corresponding first moving contact (43) that can be coupled to said first fixed contact by means of its rotation around a point (45), and a second type of pole (50) that comprises a second housing (51) containing a second fixed contact and a corresponding second moving contact that can be coupled to said second fixed contact by means of a translatory movement along an axis (55); a first kinematic coupling (6) between said control mechanism (3) and said first moving contact, in the case of said poles belonging to said first type of pole (40), or a second kinematic coupling (7) between said control mechanism and said second moving contact, in the case of said poles belonging to said second type of pole (50).