Interchangeable Helicopter Load Platforms Without Strap Entanglement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing load carrying apparatuses for rotary wing aircraft lack interchangeable platforms that are lightweight, easy to install, and foldable, and often require straps that can cause entanglement, with conventional platforms being oversized and lacking means to prevent rotation back to a folded position.

Innovation Solution

A modular load carrying apparatus with interchangeable seat-type and net-type platforms, featuring a tube with specific diameter and caps, allowing platforms to be slidably attached and restrained, eliminating the need for straps and enabling quick configuration changes without tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional platforms are used, then load carrying capacity is sufficient, but weight is excessive and installation is complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform weightVSAvoidplatform interchangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The platform system is divided into modular components: a standardized tube interface, interchangeable platform bodies (seat-type or net-type), and caps. This segmentation allows lightweight individual platforms to be exchanged without affecting the overall structure, resolving the contradiction between reduced weight and maintained versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A universal tube interface with standardized caps is designed to accommodate multiple platform types (seat-type and net-type). This universal interface enables different platform configurations to be used with the same base structure, maintaining adaptability while allowing selection of lighter platform types as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If straps are used to secure platforms, then platform stability is improved, but entanglement hazards and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform stabilityVSAvoidsecuring mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The problematic straps are completely removed from the system. Instead, a mechanical restraint mechanism using the tube and cap geometry provides platform security. This extraction eliminates entanglement hazards while maintaining stability through the protrusion-restraint interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tube cap protrusion acts as an intermediary mechanical element between the platform and the tube. This protrusion provides the restraining function previously achieved by straps, but through a simple geometric feature rather than a complex flexible element, reducing device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Volume of moving object

If platforms are made foldable for storage, then storage efficiency is improved, but means to prevent rotation back are missing causing reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage volumeVSAvoidplatform position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusion on the cap is designed to preemptively prevent unwanted rotation of the platform. By providing a physical barrier in advance, the system eliminates the risk of platform rotation back to incorrect positions, ensuring reliability while allowing foldable design for compact storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Productivity

If quick configuration changes are enabled, then operational speed is improved, but installation precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration change speedVSAvoidplatform installation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusion on the cap has a specific asymmetric geometry that corresponds to a matching recess on the platform. This asymmetric design enables quick identification and installation in the correct orientation, maintaining precision while allowing rapid configuration changes without complex alignment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12528582B2Modular load carrying apparatus with interchangeable platforms
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • US12528582B2 patent drawing
  • US12528582B2 patent drawing
  • US12528582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular load carrying apparatus for a rotary wing aircraft and to a method of operating a modular load carrying apparatus. The modular load carrying apparatus may include a tube, first and second caps that are located inside the tube at first and second axial ends, and at least first and second removable platforms that are interchangeably installable on the tube. The second cap comprises a protrusion that protrudes from the axial end, and each one of the at least first and second removable platforms is adapted for being slidable over the first axial end of the tube and restrained by the second cap at the second axial end of the tube.