Interchangeable Rotor Hammers for Variable Reducer Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing material reducing machines require time-consuming and expensive rotor substitution to change reducing configurations, limiting the ability to efficiently provide different reducer densities, patterns, counts, and positions for processing various materials.

Innovation Solution

A rotor system with interchangeable hammer components, including single-reducer and double-reducer hammers, and blank components that can be removably mounted to adjust reducer densities and patterns, allowing for multiple configurations without replacing the rotor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rotor substitution is used to change reducing configurations, then different reducer densities and patterns can be achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereducing configuration varietyVSAvoidconfiguration change time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is divided into modular segments with standardized mounting locations. Individual reducers can be independently installed, removed, or replaced at specific locations without affecting the entire rotor, enabling quick configuration changes while maintaining rotor integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A single rotor design incorporates universal mounting locations that can accommodate different types and styles of reducers. The standardized interface allows the same rotor to function with various reducer configurations, eliminating the need for multiple specialized rotors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple rotors are made available for different configurations, then versatility is improved, but the cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereducing configuration optionsVSAvoidnumber of rotors required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

One rotor design serves multiple functions by incorporating standardized mounting locations that accept various reducer types. This universal rotor replaces the need for multiple dedicated rotors, reducing inventory requirements and simplifying system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor configuration is changed by modifying parameters such as reducer type, style, and arrangement at mounting locations rather than changing the entire rotor. This allows flexible adjustment of reducing characteristics while using the same rotor hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If reducer density and patterns are fixed on the rotor, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to different materials is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor production simplicityVSAvoidmaterial processing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is manufactured with segmented mounting locations distributed around its circumference. These standardized locations allow reducers to be independently positioned and configured after rotor production, decoupling manufacturing simplicity from operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor configuration transitions from fixed to dynamic by allowing reducers to be added, removed, or repositioned at standardized mounting locations. This enables the rotor to be dynamically reconfigured for different materials without requiring complex manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11338298B2Material reducing apparatus having a system for allowing a reducing rotor to be selectively configured in multiple different reducing configurations
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 VERMEER MFG CO
  • US11338298B2 patent drawing
  • US11338298B2 patent drawing
  • US11338298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a system for a material reducing machine that allows a reducing rotor to be selectively configurable in a plurality of different reducing configurations. The different reducing configurations in which the reducing rotor can be configured can include reducing configurations having reducers located at different positions, reducing configurations having different reducer densities (e.g., different overall densities and different regionalized densities), reducer configurations having different reducer counts, reducer configurations having different reducer patterns, and reducer configurations having different lay-outs.