Interest Taxonomy Construction for Evolving User Content Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional content understanding and curation techniques lack depth, granularity, adaptability, and comprehensive coverage, leading to ineffective matching of user interests due to static taxonomies and fragmented systems.

Innovation Solution

An interest graph is constructed using unsupervised machine learning to dynamically adapt to emerging interests, leveraging tailored preprocessing, unsupervised keyword extraction, and a pairwise classification model for content tagging, providing a granular and expansive taxonomy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional static taxonomies are used for content categorization, then system complexity is reduced, but adaptability to evolving user interests deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to evolving user interestsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic taxonomy system that automatically evolves with user interests through machine learning. The system continuously updates category structures and relationships based on analyzed user interactions, transforming static content categorization into an adaptive framework that grows and reorganizes itself according to emerging user preferences and behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs unsupervised machine learning algorithms that automatically extract keywords, identify categories, and construct taxonomy structures without human intervention. The content understanding system self-organizes and self-updates by analyzing user interactions, eliminating the need for manual taxonomy maintenance while achieving continuous adaptation to evolving interests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive content analysis is performed to achieve deep content understanding, then content curation quality improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent understanding depthVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary content analysis by pre-processing and indexing content features during ingestion. Keywords, metadata, and structural elements are extracted and stored in advance, enabling rapid retrieval and comparison during content curation operations without requiring complete re-analysis, thus reducing real-time processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual or rule-based content analysis with unsupervised machine learning models that automatically understand content semantics. These algorithms efficiently process and interpret content at scale, achieving deep understanding through pattern recognition and statistical analysis rather than exhaustive mechanical examination of each content element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual taxonomy construction is used, then taxonomy accuracy improves, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetaxonomy accuracyVSAvoidtaxonomy construction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically constructs and maintains taxonomies through unsupervised learning algorithms that analyze content patterns and user behaviors. The machine learning model self-organizes category structures, extracts meaningful keywords, and establishes relationships between concepts without human intervention, achieving both accuracy through intelligent pattern recognition and high productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts taxonomy parameters such as category granularity, relationship weights, and hierarchical structures based on analyzed data patterns. The system modifies taxonomy characteristics in response to emerging content trends and user preferences, maintaining accuracy through adaptive parameter optimization while achieving rapid construction through algorithmic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260017328A1Automatic techniques for constructing an evolving interest taxonomy from user-generated content
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 SNAP INC
  • US20260017328A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017328A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017328A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for creating an interest graph include obtaining content items from multiple content sources and applying tailored (e.g., source-specific) preprocessing to the content items based on their respective content source. Text is extracted and salient keywords and key phrases are identified using unsupervised machine learning models. The keywords and key phrases become nodes in an interest graph, each node comprising an embedding of a keyword or key phrase in a common embedding space, with edges representing semantic similarity based on embeddings or co-engagement patterns. The graph provides an expansive, granular, and dynamic taxonomy easily adaptable to emerging interests. The interest graph overcomes limitations of conventional taxonomies that lack depth, fail to capture niche interests, and cannot adapt to reflect evolving user preferences. The described techniques construct a rich interest graph from diverse content for improved content understanding.