Interface Bridge Time Stamp Conversion MIL-STD-1760 to UAI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft platforms with legacy MIL-STD-1760 interfaces are incompatible with modern UAI-equipped weapons, requiring significant software upgrades and hardware modifications, which is costly and inefficient for integrating miniature munitions.

Innovation Solution

An interface bridge that translates between the MIL-STD-1760 interface and UAI, enabling real-time logical or messaging translation, time stamp conversion, and data conversion to facilitate the integration of UAI weapons on legacy platforms without major avionics software changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If legacy MIL-STD-1760 interfaces are used on aircraft platforms, then compatibility with older weapon systems is maintained, but integration with modern UAI-equipped weapons becomes incompatible requiring significant software upgrades and hardware modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweapon integration compatibilityVSAvoidavionics software modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An interface bridge is introduced as an intermediary device between the legacy MIL-STD-1760 bus controller and the modern UAI remote terminal. The interface bridge receives messages from the MIL-STD-1760 bus controller, detects the time stamping technique used, determines a recomputed time tag, and transmits the message with the recomputed time tag to the UAI remote terminal, thereby enabling compatibility without modifying the legacy aircraft platform software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface bridge creates a virtual copy or translation layer that mimics the UAI protocol on the legacy MIL-STD-1760 platform. By implementing a software-based translation mechanism, the system replicates modern UAI functionality on older hardware without requiring physical hardware modifications to the aircraft avionics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If significant software upgrades and hardware modifications are implemented to achieve compatibility, then modern UAI weapons can be integrated, but integration costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweapon integration compatibilityVSAvoidintegration cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The interface bridge serves as a cost-effective intermediary solution that avoids expensive platform-wide software upgrades and hardware modifications. By isolating the translation functionality to a single interface bridge unit, the integration cost is dramatically reduced while maintaining full compatibility with modern UAI weapons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The integration solution is segmented into a modular interface bridge that handles only the protocol translation function, separate from the main aircraft avionics system. This segmentation allows the legacy platform to remain unchanged while adding modern capability through a standalone, affordable interface device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If time stamp conversion is implemented at the interface bridge, then accurate time tagging is ensured for precise weapon operation, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime tagging accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface bridge autonomously detects which time stamping technique is used in incoming messages and automatically determines the appropriate recomputed time tag without external intervention. The system self-manages the time stamp conversion process by identifying the message format and applying the correct conversion algorithm, thereby maintaining precision while minimizing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The interface bridge incorporates feedback mechanisms where it monitors incoming message formats, detects the time stamping technique used, and adjusts its processing accordingly. This feedback-driven approach allows the system to handle multiple time stamping techniques dynamically without requiring complex manual configuration or processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10122833B2Time stamp conversion in an interface bridge
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 RAYTHEON CO
  • US10122833B2 patent drawing
  • US10122833B2 patent drawing
  • US10122833B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technology is described for converting a time tag in a message. The message can be received from a military standard-1760 (MIL-STD-1760) bus controller. The message can include a time tag in accordance with a first time stamping technique. The time tag in the message can be detected as being in accordance with the first time stamping technique based on contents of the message. A recomputed time tag for the message can be determined in accordance with a second time stamping technique. The message with the recomputed time tag can be transmitted to a Universal Armament Interface (UAI) remote terminal.