Hierarchical Interface Decomposition for FPGA Timing Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated place-and-route electronic design automation (EDA) solutions often fail to meet the strict timing requirements of interface portions in circuit designs, particularly in FPGA implementations, leading to routing congestion and delays that exceed the required timing specifications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves decomposing the interface portion of a circuit design into multiple levels, where each level specifies connections between a first set of circuit elements with fixed locations and a second set of circuit elements, allowing for level-by-level placing-and-routing, with the main portion routed after the interface elements are placed-and-routed, optimizing timing by determining actual timing based on placement and routing in each level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated place-and-route EDA solutions are used, then productivity is improved, but timing requirements cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated place-and-route efficiencyVSAvoidtiming requirement compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interface portion is divided into multiple levels, where each level contains a subset of circuit elements and connections. This segmentation allows the automated EDA tool to process and optimize timing for each level independently, improving overall timing compliance while maintaining automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary placement and routing of circuit elements in each level before moving to the next level. This preliminary action ensures that timing-critical paths are established early, allowing subsequent levels to be optimized based on the timing constraints imposed by previous levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If traditional place-and-route methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but routing congestion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated EDA operationVSAvoidrouting congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the interface portion into multiple levels, the method reduces the complexity of routing decisions at any single level. This segmentation prevents routing congestion by distributing connections across multiple levels, where each level handles a manageable subset of connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method introduces a hierarchical dimension to the traditional planar routing approach. By organizing circuit elements and connections into multiple levels, the routing problem is transformed from a two-dimensional congestion issue to a multi-dimensional optimization problem, allowing routes to be established in a hierarchical manner that avoids congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If traditional place-and-route methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but timing optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplace-and-route process complexityVSAvoidtiming optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The interface portion is segmented into multiple levels, each with specific timing optimization requirements. This segmentation allows targeted timing optimization at each level without requiring complete redesign of the entire interface portion, thus improving timing precision while controlling overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different levels of the interface portion are optimized with different levels of detail and complexity. Levels closer to the fixed locations receive more intensive optimization, while subsequent levels use progressively simpler optimization strategies, achieving local quality optimization that balances complexity and timing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10503861B1Placing and routing an interface portion and a main portion of a circuit design
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 XILINX INC
  • US10503861B1 patent drawing
  • US10503861B1 patent drawing
  • US10503861B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A netlist of a circuit design includes an interface portion and a main portion. The interface portion is decomposed into multiple levels. Each level specifies connections between a respective first set of circuit elements and a respective second set of circuit elements. The second set of circuit elements in each level, except a last level, includes the first set of circuit elements in a next level. The first set of circuit elements identified in a first level of the multiple levels have fixed locations. The second set of circuit elements in the multiple levels is placed-and-routed. The placing-and-routing of the second set of circuit elements in one level is completed before commencing placing-and-routing of the second set of circuit elements in the next level. The main portion is placed-and-routed after placing-and-routing the second set of circuit elements in the multiple levels.