Interference Estimation Using Packet Characteristics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional interference estimation techniques in wireless communication systems fail to accurately account for interfering channel traffic, leading to suboptimal data recovery due to collisions between messages.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that process packet characteristics such as power level, occupied frequency, and time references to weight channel samples where interference occurs, allowing for precise de-weighting of interference and enhancing data recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional interference estimation techniques are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the accuracy of data recovery deteriorates due to failure to account for interfering channel traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of data recoveryVSAvoidcomplexity of interference estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by accumulating packet characteristics (power level, occupied frequency, time references) before the actual interference estimation. This pre-processing of interference information allows for more accurate data recovery without increasing real-time computational complexity during the demodulation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces packet characteristics as intermediary elements that mediate between the interfering channel traffic and the data recovery process. By using these characteristics (power level, frequency, time references) as intermediaries, the system can accurately account for interference effects without directly processing complex interference signals in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If frequency hopping and coding techniques are employed, then the robustness of data transmission is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of data transmissionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by using accumulated packet characteristics (power level, frequency, time references) to weight channel samples during demodulation. This parameter-based approach allows the system to maintain robustness through interference awareness while avoiding the high computational complexity of traditional signal processing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If interference is de-weighted using conventional techniques, then the data reception is improved, but the accuracy deteriorates due to failure to account for interfering channel traffic nature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of interference de-weightingVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary accumulation of packet characteristics before the demodulation process. This pre-computation of interference information allows for accurate interference de-weighting during data reception without increasing real-time computational requirements, thus maintaining both accuracy and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7414980B1Interference estimation for interference excision with low computational complexity
Publication Date: 2008.08.19 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US7414980B1 patent drawing
  • US7414980B1 patent drawing
  • US7414980B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a method and system for estimating interference. Packet characteristics of relevant packets within the channel at a given point in time may be processed. For example, a power level, occupied frequency and corresponding time references may be accumulated and stored for each relevant packet within the channel at a given point in time. As each packet is processed for demodulation, the channel samples, at which interference occurred, may be appropriately weighted based on the packet characteristics. Advantageously, the nature of the interfering channel traffic may be measured to properly de-weight the interference in a computationally efficient manner.