Interference-Fit Cover-to-Casing Joint for Food Housing Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing housing elements for food applications face challenges in securing casings made of stainless steel and covers made of composite materials, particularly in ensuring a reliable and stable seal during processing operations, as existing solutions often fail to provide a consistent and secure interference-fit joint.

Innovation Solution

A housing element system featuring a stainless steel casing with symmetrical T-shaped grooves and a composite material cover with matching steps, ensuring an interference-fit joint that allows for secure closure in both directions of rotation, utilizing an interference-fit joint with specific dimensional tolerances and a connecting radius to facilitate assembly and prevent disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an interference-fit joint is used to secure the cover to the casing, then the sealing reliability is improved, but the assembly difficulty increases due to tight tolerances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The groove and step geometries are pre-designed with specific dimensional relationships (groove width slightly larger than step width, connecting radius at groove base) that enable self-alignment and facilitate assembly while maintaining interference-fit sealing reliability. The preliminary geometric configuration allows the cover to be easily assembled onto the casing without requiring force or complex alignment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the groove dimensions are increased to facilitate assembly, then the ease of operation is improved, but the sealing performance deteriorates due to reduced interference fit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly easeVSAvoidsealing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The groove is designed with non-uniform dimensions: the width at the top (first portion) is larger to facilitate assembly, while the width at the bottom (second portion) is smaller to maintain interference-fit sealing. The connecting radius at the groove base creates a transition zone that ensures proper contact between the step and groove surfaces, providing both assembly ease and sealing performance through localized dimensional variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a symmetrical T-shaped groove is used, then the adaptability is improved by allowing closure in both directions, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure direction flexibilityVSAvoidgroove symmetry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

While the overall groove shape is symmetrical T-shaped to allow bidirectional closure, the groove incorporates asymmetric local features (connecting radius positioned at the base, specific width variations along the groove depth) that guide the assembly process and reduce sensitivity to manufacturing tolerances. This combination of global symmetry and local asymmetry provides both adaptability and manufacturing robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS11292639B2System for securing a casing and a cover of a housing element
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US11292639B2 patent drawing
  • US11292639B2 patent drawing
  • US11292639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A housing element for food applications having a casing made of metallic material and a cover made of composite material and having a bottom surface which is closed or provided with a through-hole. The housing element is provided with a system for securing the cover on the casing, comprising at least two steps which are formed on the cover and which engage with interference inside at least two corresponding grooves formed on the casing.