Interference-Fit Gear Teeth for Lightweight High-Strength Gears

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gear materials for aircraft gearboxes are limited by high costs and manufacturability issues, making it difficult to achieve reduced size and weight with improved mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a shaft with a groove and a tooth inserted via an interference fit, where the tooth is made of a material with superior mechanical properties, such as metallic glass, and the shaft of a cheaper material, with additional retention by a steel sleeve retainer to maintain positional stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If materials with improved mechanical properties are used for gears, then the mechanical properties are improved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The gear is constructed with different materials for different parts: the tooth is made of expensive material with superior mechanical properties (such as metallic glass), while the shaft is made of cheaper material. This local differentiation allows the expensive material to be used only where it is most needed (in the tooth for load-bearing), thereby improving mechanical properties while controlling overall cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Weight of moving object

If the gear size is reduced, then the weight is reduced, but the mechanical properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The gear employs a composite construction where the tooth is made of expensive material with superior mechanical properties (such as metallic glass) and the shaft is made of cheaper material. This composite approach allows the gear to achieve high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling size and weight reduction while maintaining or improving mechanical properties through the superior material in the critical tooth region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If a tooth is inserted into a groove without additional retention, then the device complexity is reduced, but the tooth positional stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidtooth positional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth is retained in the groove through an interference fit, where the tooth dimensions are slightly larger than the groove dimensions to create a press-fit connection. This parameter change in dimensional tolerance creates a self-retaining mechanism that maintains tooth positional stability without requiring additional retention components, thereby keeping device complexity low while ensuring stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If the tooth is made of expensive material, then the mechanical properties are improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The expensive material is used specifically for the tooth portion where superior mechanical properties are most critical for load-bearing and gear engagement, while the shaft is made of cheaper material. This localized application of high-performance material optimizes the balance between mechanical properties and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces costs while enhancing mechanical properties, allowing for smaller, lighter gears with improved performance and reduced sliding, effectively addressing the limitations of current materials.

Implementation Method 1

The method may comprise the shaft being at a higher temperature than the tooth while inserting the tooth into the groove

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

The method may comprise cooling the tooth to a temperature T2 while inserting the tooth into the groove

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 3

inserting a tooth into the groove such that the tooth is retained in the groove by an interference fit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240269785A1Gear
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 GOODRICH ACTUATION SYST
  • US20240269785A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269785A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269785A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a gear includes: providing a shaft; forming a groove into the shaft; and inserting a tooth into the groove such that the tooth is retained in the groove by an interference fit. A retainer can also be fixed to the shaft such that the tooth is retained in the groove by the retainer in addition to the interference fit.