Interference Information Indication for NOMA Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in effectively indicating and canceling interference between User Equipments (UEs) in non-orthogonal multiple access scenarios, leading to reduced system capacity and increased delay, particularly due to intra-cell and inter-cell interference.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for indicating interference information to User Equipments (UEs) via dynamic or semi-static signaling, allowing them to cancel interference by providing parameters such as interfering layer or UE information, spreading sequences, transmit power, modulation and coding schemes, and PRB indices, enabling all, partial, or no interference cancellation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) technology is implemented to improve system capacity and reduce delay, then more UEs can communicate concurrently, but intra-cell interference between UEs increases and requires complex interference cancellation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidinterference cancellation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where the network device (eNB) acts as a mediator by signaling interference information to UEs. This intermediary approach allows UEs to perform network-assisted interference cancellation without requiring complex blind detection capabilities, thus resolving the contradiction between improved system capacity and reduced interference cancellation complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the network device pre-signal interference information (such as spreading sequences, power levels, and modulation schemes) to UEs before the actual data reception. This allows UEs to prepare interference cancellation parameters in advance, reducing the computational complexity during active communication while maintaining high system capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If blind detection of interference information is performed by UEs, then signaling overhead is reduced, but detection complexity and error rate increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignaling overheadVSAvoidinterference information detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The network device serves as an intermediary that provides structured interference information through signaling. This intermediary approach balances the trade-off by reducing signaling overhead compared to full blind detection while avoiding the high complexity and error rates associated with completely blind interference detection by UEs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If complete interference cancellation is performed by all UEs, then communication quality improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by enabling UEs to perform interference cancellation selectively based on signaled parameters rather than requiring complete cancellation for all UEs. The network device signals interference information that allows UEs to cancel interference partially or fully depending on their specific reception conditions, thus improving communication quality for those who need it while reducing processing time for others

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic interference cancellation where the extent of cancellation is adjusted based on real-time conditions. The network device can dynamically signal different interference parameters to different UEs, allowing the system to adapt the level of interference cancellation to actual communication needs, balancing quality improvement with processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3291472B1Interference information indicating method, and interference cancelling method and device
Publication Date: 2020.03.11 CHINA ACAD OF TELECOMM TECH
  • EP3291472B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3291472B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3291472B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are an interference information indicating method, and an interference cancelling method and device. The interference information indicating method comprises: network equipment determines interference information indicated to a user equipment (UE), the interference information being used for instructing the UE to perform all cancellation, partial cancellation, or no cancellation on interference in a received signal; and the network equipment indicates the interference information to the UE by signaling. By using the method and device provided by the embodiments of the present invention, network equipment can acquire interference information relevant to a UE, and can further transmit the interference information to the UE, thereby enabling the UE to perform, according to the interference information, interference cancellation on a received signal.