Interference Rejection Membranes for Amperometric Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional amperometric glucose sensors face interference from substances like acetaminophen and ascorbic acid, leading to spurious signals due to overlapping oxidation or reduction potentials, complicating sensor manufacturing and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

Development of interference rejection membranes (IRMs) using polymers like polyvinyl alcohol and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) formed via light-mediated polymerization, allowing selective deposition on sensor electrodes to block interfering species, and employing a dual-working electrode configuration for signal characterization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If interference rejection membranes are selectively coated on certain areas of sensor electrodes, then sensor accuracy is improved by blocking interfering species, but device complexity increases due to selective coating requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accuracyVSAvoidcoating process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming interference rejection membranes with different properties in different locations on the sensor electrode. The selective area coating creates regions with distinct functionality: one region blocks interfering species while another allows analyte access, enabling both interference rejection and analyte detection on the same electrode surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the electrode surface into multiple functional regions by selectively coating different areas with interference rejection membranes. This segmentation allows the electrode to perform multiple functions simultaneously - detecting analytes in uncoated regions while rejecting interferents in coated regions, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring separate electrodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional IRM formulations are used, then interference rejection is achieved, but manufacturing difficulty increases due to inability to control deposition locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference rejectionVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the IRM formulation by incorporating photoinitiators and using specific polymer compositions that can be selectively polymerized. This allows control over where and when the membrane forms, enabling precise deposition on selected electrode areas while maintaining effective interference rejection properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by first coating the entire electrode surface with a precursor layer containing polymerizable monomers and photoinitiators, then selectively polymerizing this layer in specific areas using light exposure. This preliminary coating followed by selective activation simplifies manufacturing compared to attempting direct selective coating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances sensor accuracy by reducing interference from non-target substances, simplifies manufacturing by enabling precise IRM placement, and improves patient compliance monitoring through better signal tracking.

Implementation Method 1

the interference rejection membrane is formed by a reaction mixture comprising a polymerizable monomer, a crosslinking agent and a photoinitiator agent; and the interference rejection membrane is cured when the reaction mixture is polymerized by exposure to light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

the IRMs are crosslinked in situ, for example by a diacrylate crosslinking agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrosslinking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

Interference rejection membranes (IRMs) are used in amperometric analyte sensors to prevent interferents such as acetaminophen and ascorbic acid from contacting working electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier rejection: Semipermeable Membrane

Data Source

PatentUS20240298941A1Interference rejection membranes useful with analyte sensors
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC
  • US20240298941A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298941A1 patent drawing
  • US20240298941A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide amperometric analyte sensors having optimized elements such as interference rejection membranes, and associated architectures, as well as methods for making and using such sensors. While embodiments of the innovation can be used in a variety of contexts, typical embodiments of the invention include glucose sensors used in the management of diabetes.