Interference-Triggered Frequency Hopping for Wireless Overhead Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Frequency hopping systems experience increased overhead and interference due to constant channel switching, leading to longer communication setup times and data loss, especially as bit rates increase.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an interference-triggered frequency hopping method where frequency hopping only occurs when interference is detected, allowing the system to operate on a fixed frequency otherwise, using a pre-defined or pre-computed frequency hopping algorithm to select new channels based on performance criteria, and switching only when interference is present.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If frequency hopping is implemented continuously to protect against interference, then reliability is improved, but overhead increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference protectionVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs frequency hopping periodically or on-demand rather than continuously. The master node switches frequencies based on interference detection or predetermined schedules, allowing the system to maintain reliability when needed while minimizing overhead during normal operation. This is evident in the patent where hopping occurs only when interference is detected or according to predetermined patterns rather than constant switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the frequency parameter based on detected interference levels or communication needs. When interference is detected, the system transitions to a different frequency; when no interference is present, it maintains the current frequency. This adaptive parameter change resolves the contradiction by adjusting the degree of frequency hopping to match actual communication conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If frequency hopping occurs constantly to avoid interference, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to channel switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference avoidanceVSAvoidchannel switching time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of constant frequency switching, the system employs periodic or event-driven hopping where frequency changes occur only at specific intervals or when interference is detected. This reduces the cumulative channel switching time while maintaining interference avoidance capabilities when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary interference detection before initiating frequency hops, and uses predetermined frequency sequences to minimize decision-making time during switching. By preparing frequency transition plans in advance and detecting interference proactively, the system reduces the actual time lost during channel switching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If frequency hopping is used to protect against interference, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to continuous channel switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference protectionVSAvoidchannel switching mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system reduces device complexity by implementing frequency hopping on a periodic or event-driven basis rather than continuously. This allows the channel switching mechanism to remain simple and dormant during normal operation, activating only when interference is detected or according to predetermined schedules, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If frequency hopping occurs regularly to avoid interference, then reliability is improved, but interference produced and received expands on all channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigationVSAvoidinterference expansion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies frequency hopping locally and selectively rather than globally and universally. Instead of all nodes hopping on all channels simultaneously, the master node performs targeted frequency switching based on local interference conditions, confining interference effects to specific channels and times rather than expanding interference across the entire frequency spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By implementing periodic or on-demand frequency hopping rather than continuous hopping across all channels, the system limits interference expansion to only those channels and time periods when hopping actually occurs. This reduces the overall interference footprint while maintaining the reliability benefits where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8976835B2System and method for interference triggered frequency hopping
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 AVIAT U S
  • US8976835B2 patent drawing
  • US8976835B2 patent drawing
  • US8976835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of interference-triggered frequency hopping in a wireless communication system. A master is provided in the wireless communication system in wireless communication with slave nodes each configured to use different preselected communication frequencies to permit frequency hopping. A current channel is selected from among multiple channels in the wireless communication system in which the master and at least some of the slave nodes send and receive wireless communications. Each of the channels uses different ones of the preselected communication frequencies. In the current channel, interference with communications between the master and a selected one of the slave nodes that use the current channel is detected. A new channel is selected only in response to detecting the interference. The system switches from the current channel to the new channel such that communications between the master and the selected slave node use the new channel.