Interior Magnet Rotor Corner Slopes for Demagnetization Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interior magnet rotors with permanent magnets face challenges such as demagnetization, chipping, and increased manufacturing costs due to the need for chamfering and division of magnets, which affect magnetic flux and efficiency in synchronous machines.

Innovation Solution

The design features a rotor with a rotor shaft and core housing multiple permanent magnets arranged in a row, each with 45-degree corner slopes on opposite corners, reducing the demagnetizing factor and eddy current without increasing the risk of chipping, and allowing for shorter positioning projections in the magnet housing hole.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If chamfering is performed on permanent magnets to prevent chipping, then chipping resistance is improved, but manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechipping resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms the permanent magnets with rounded corners directly during the sintering process, rather than performing chamfering after manufacturing. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent chamfering operations, preventing chipping while reducing manufacturing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If chamfering is performed to prevent chipping, then chipping resistance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechipping resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms the permanent magnets with rounded corners directly during the sintering process, rather than performing chamfering after manufacturing. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent chamfering operations, preventing chipping while reducing manufacturing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If permanent magnets are divided into multiple pieces to reduce eddy current, then efficiency is improved, but contact frequency between corners increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy currentVSAvoidchipping risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different corner radius values to different corners of the permanent magnets based on their position. Magnets at positions with higher contact frequency have larger corner radii, while others have smaller radii. This localized adaptation reduces eddy current through proper segmentation while minimizing chipping risk at critical contact points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If corner slopes are formed by removing vertex portions, then chipping is prevented, but magnetic force is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechipping preventionVSAvoidmagnetic force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of corner radius to optimize the balance between chipping prevention and magnetic force maintenance. By forming rounded corners with specific radius values during sintering, the patent prevents chipping while minimizing the reduction in magnetic force compared to traditional chamfering that removes material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the demagnetizing factor by 33% for thin magnets and 9% for thick magnets, improves demagnetization resistance, and enhances torque-current characteristics by minimizing the reduction in magnetic force, while maintaining the same contact area and preventing corner chipping.

Implementation Method 1

a rotor shaft extending in a rotation axis direction; a rotor core that has at least one magnet housing hole formed in each magnetic pole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of permanent magnets instead of a single permanent magnet are sometimes housed in a magnet hole of a rotor core, that is, the permanent magnet is practically divided into a plurality of pieces, whereby an eddy current generated in the permanent magnet is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS20240072583A1Interior magnet rotor and interior magnet rotary electric machine
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 KK TOSHIBA
  • US20240072583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240072583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240072583A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an interior magnet rotor includes a rotor shaft extending in a rotation axis direction, a rotor core, and a plurality of permanent magnets. The rotor core has at least one magnet housing hole formed in each magnetic pole and sandwiched by a first wall and a second wall, and is attached to the rotor shaft. The plurality of permanent magnets are housed in the magnet housing hole and are arranged in a row in one direction in a cross section of the magnet housing hole. The permanent magnets each have a substantially rectangular parallelepiped outer shape and have slopes formed over a longitudinal direction on two corners opposite to each other.