Interlaced Magnetic Recording for High Areal Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnetic recording technologies face challenges in increasing data storage density while preventing adjacent data from being overwritten, as smaller cell sizes require stronger write field gradients, leading to performance trade-offs in areal density capability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of interlaced magnetic recording (IMR) systems, which utilize alternating data tracks of different written track widths with overlapping edges, allowing for non-consecutive writing of data tracks to achieve higher areal density and random writeability without degrading adjacent tracks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If cell size is decreased to increase data storage density, then areal density capability is improved, but write field gradient strength deteriorates making it difficult to shift polarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storage densityVSAvoidwrite field gradient
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic medium into alternating data tracks and interlaced tracks with different write densities. By dividing the storage medium into distinct track types with specialized characteristics, the system can optimize each segment for its specific function while maintaining overall high areal density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions with different write densities - some tracks are written at higher density while others at lower density. This allows each local region to have optimized properties for its intended use, with alternate tracks serving different functional roles in the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If write element size is decreased to match smaller cells, then areal density is improved, but adjacent cell polarization deteriorates due to insufficient field gradient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal densityVSAvoidadjacent cell polarization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data storage into alternate tracks with different write characteristics. By separating tracks into distinct groups with different density profiles, the system prevents write operations on one track from interfering with adjacent tracks, thus maintaining polarization reliability while achieving high areal density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces interlaced tracks as intermediary elements between data tracks. These interlaced tracks act as buffers or mediators that prevent direct interference between adjacent data tracks during write operations, allowing smaller write elements to be used without compromising adjacent cell polarization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If shingled magnetic recording is used to increase areal density, then data storage capacity is improved, but write flexibility deteriorates requiring re-writing of multiple tracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal density capabilityVSAvoidwrite flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic medium into alternate data tracks and interlaced tracks with different write characteristics. This segmentation allows independent access and modification of individual tracks without requiring re-writing of multiple shingled tracks, thus maintaining write flexibility while achieving high areal density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making tracks dependent on each other as in shingled recording where writing one track requires rewriting others, the patent inverts this relationship by creating independent alternate tracks. This allows random writes to any track without affecting others, reversing the dependency model of SMR while maintaining high density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Quantity of substance

If write element width is made larger than track pitch in SMR, then areal density is improved, but data integrity deteriorates due to overwriting of adjacent cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal densityVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments tracks into alternate data tracks and interlaced tracks, allowing the use of larger write elements on interlaced tracks without compromising data integrity on data tracks. The segmentation isolates the potential harm of large write elements to specific track types while preserving integrity on other tracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different write densities to different local regions (tracks). By making interlaced tracks writable with larger write elements while keeping data tracks protected, the system allows larger effective write widths in certain regions without compromising overall data integrity, thus achieving higher areal density safely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

IMR systems enhance areal density and system performance by allowing random writes while maintaining data integrity, exceeding the limitations of conventional and shingled magnetic recording systems, and enabling sequential reads without degrading data tracks.

Implementation Method 1

a strong write field gradient is needed to shift the polarity of cells on a magnetized medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

writing data to smaller cells on the magnetized medium using the relatively larger write pole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9842047B2Non-sequential write for sequential read back
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9842047B2 patent drawing
  • US9842047B2 patent drawing
  • US9842047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage device controller addresses consecutively-addressed portions of incoming data to consecutive data tracks on a storage medium and writes the consecutively-addressed portions to the consecutive data tracks in a non-consecutive track order. In one implementation, the storage device controller reads the data back from the consecutive data tracks in a consecutive address order in a single sequential read operation.