Interleaved Boost PFC Converter Valley-Switching Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

DC-DC switching power converters have poor power factor due to their non-linear impedance with respect to AC mains, which is not effectively addressed by existing power-factor-correction converters.

Innovation Solution

The method involves operating a power converter by charging and discharging inductances in boost converters, synchronizing switching periods based on prior periods and offset values, and modifying these values to ensure valley switching in both phases of the converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If a power-factor-correction converter is implemented prior to the downstream DC-DC switching power converter, then the power factor is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower factorVSAvoidconverter structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PFC converter is divided into two interleaved boost converter phases that operate in alternation. Each phase has its own inductance, switch, and diode, allowing the system to process input current in two separate channels that combine to produce a sinusoidal input current waveform, improving power factor while distributing the complexity across modular segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two phases of the boost converter operate in interleaved periodic cycles, with each phase conducting for half of the total switching period. This periodic alternation between phases allows continuous power transfer while enabling valley switching optimization, where the offset value is adjusted based on which phase reaches its valley current first.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Loss of energy

If valley switching is implemented in the boost converter phases, then the efficiency is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossesVSAvoidcontrol circuit
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit monitors the current through each phase's inductance and detects when it reaches a predetermined valley current level. Based on this feedback, the controller asserts valley signals and dynamically adjusts the offset value to ensure valley switching occurs, minimizing switching losses while adapting to changing operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The offset value used for synchronizing the two phases is dynamically adjusted based on the relative timing of valley current detection in each phase. When one phase reaches valley current before the other, the offset is modified to maintain optimal valley switching, allowing the system to adapt to varying load and line conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the switching period is synchronized based on prior switching period duration and offset value, then the valley switching is achieved, but the timing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalley switching achievementVSAvoidtiming measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an adjustable offset value that can be modified to optimize the timing synchronization between the two phases. By changing this parameter, the controller can account for variations in switching period duration and ensure that valley switching is achieved even under different operating conditions, reducing the stringency of timing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the power factor by ensuring valley switching in both phases of the converter, thereby enhancing the efficiency and performance of the power converter system.

Implementation Method 1

charging a first-phase inductance of a first boost converter, and then discharging the first-phase inductance through a first diode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12267004B2Methods and systems of power-factor-correction converters
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC
  • US12267004B2 patent drawing
  • US12267004B2 patent drawing
  • US12267004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

PFC converters. One example is a method of operating a power converter, the method comprising: charging a first-phase inductance of a first boost converter, and then discharging the first-phase inductance, the charging and discharging defines a first switching period of the first boost converter; asserting, during the first switching period, a sync-two signal based on a duration of a prior switching period of the first boost converter and an offset value; asserting, during the first switching period, a valley-two signal when current through a second-phase inductance of a second boost converter reaches a predetermined valley current; responsive to the assertion of the sync-two signal and the valley-two signal, charging the second-phase inductance, and then discharging the second-phase inductance; and responsive to relative timing of the assertion of the sync-two signal and assertion of the valley-two signal, modifying the offset value.