Interleaved Chirp Signal Packets for Multi-Distance Receiver Sensitivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chirp communication systems face challenges in reliably transmitting signals to both proximal and distal receivers, especially in noisy environments, without increasing power consumption or adding error correction bits, which are costly and power-hungry in low-power, low-silicon area devices.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating a chirp signal by interleaving packets with different symbol periods and bandwidths, allowing for flexible integration by receivers, and negotiating a frequency hopping sequence to ensure compatibility across varying distances and interference levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmit power is increased to enable reliable receipt at distal receivers, then signal detectability is improved, but power consumption increases and interference to other users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detectabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitted signal is segmented into multiple chirp packets with different symbol periods. Some packets use longer symbol periods that provide better signal-to-noise ratio for distal receivers, while shorter symbol period packets are used for proximal receivers. This segmentation allows the system to achieve reliable communication at different distances without uniformly increasing power consumption across all transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the symbol period parameter of chirp packets dynamically. By varying the symbol period (and consequently the bandwidth) of different packets, the transmitter can optimize signal detectability for receivers at different distances. Longer symbol periods provide better integration gain for distal receivers without requiring increased transmit power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If error correction bits are added to improve reliable receipt in noisy environments, then communication reliability is improved, but device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication protocol is segmented into multiple packets with different robustness characteristics. Instead of adding complex error correction codes to all packets, the system uses a diversity of packet types where some packets are inherently more robust due to their longer symbol periods and better integration gain. This reduces the need for complex error correction machinery while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple inexpensive packet transmissions with varying characteristics rather than relying on complex error correction. If some packets are lost or corrupted due to noise, other packets with different timing and frequency characteristics may succeed, providing redundancy without requiring sophisticated error correction algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If frequent high power signals are transmitted to ensure receipt at all receivers, then signal detectability is improved, but battery life decreases and interference to other users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detectabilityVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter sends periodic chirp packets with different symbol periods in an alternating or interleaved manner. This periodic variation allows proximal receivers to successfully decode shorter packets while distal receivers can integrate over longer packets. The periodic structure maintains reliability without requiring continuous high-power transmission, thereby conserving battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If packets with different symbol periods are interleaved, then receiver sensitivity is improved for varying distances, but signal processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the symbol period parameter of different packets in a predetermined interleaved pattern. Receivers are designed to handle multiple symbol period values by adjusting their integration time accordingly. While this does increase processing complexity compared to a single symbol period system, the complexity is manageable through efficient correlation techniques and is justified by the significant improvement in receiver sensitivity across varying distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8848827B2Chirp communications using interleaved symbols of varying periods
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 QUALCOMM TECH INT
  • US8848827B2 patent drawing
  • US8848827B2 patent drawing
  • US8848827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of communicating a chirp signal from a transmitter suitable for receipt at a proximal receiver and a distal receiver, the chirp signal including a plurality of packets, each packet including at least one symbol, each symbol including one or more identical chirps, the method including: generating the chirp signal by interleaving constituent packets of: (i) a first set of packets encoded with first data, each packet including one or more symbols having a first time period t1, and (ii) a second set of packets encoded with second data, each packet including one or more symbols having a second time period t2, where t1<t2; and transmitting the generated chirp signal.