Interleaved Totem Pole PFC Phase Synchronization Under Variable Frequency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing totem pole PFC topologies face challenges with high ripple current, additional switching losses, and phase detection errors due to variable frequency, which affect efficiency and complexity in multiphase interleaved operations.

Innovation Solution

A controller and method for a PFC system that operates phases under variable frequency control, using a phase correction circuit to synchronize and adjust switching periods based on measured phase shifts, ensuring out-of-phase synchronization in a totem pole interleaved topology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If TCM (Triangular Current mode) is used for totem pole PFC control, then ZVS (Zero Volt Switching) is achieved eliminating turn-on switching losses, but very high ripple current occurs at more than 100% of average current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturn-on switching lossesVSAvoidripple current
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single-phase TCM operation into multiple interleaved phases. By segmenting the current waveform across multiple phases, the ripple current from each phase cancels out partially, reducing the total ripple current while maintaining the ZVS benefit of TCM operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple TCM-controlled phases into an interleaved operation. The merging of multiple phase currents with appropriate phase shifting reduces the overall ripple current while preserving the zero-volt switching characteristics of each phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Quantity of substance

If multiphase interleaved approach is used to compensate for high ripple current, then ripple current is reduced, but additional switching power losses occur and efficiency reduces at light load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveripple currentVSAvoidswitching power losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic phase enablement where the number of active phases is adjusted based on load conditions. At light load, fewer phases are enabled to reduce switching losses, while at heavy load, more phases are enabled to maintain low ripple current, creating a dynamic adaptation to operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters by varying the number of active phases based on load current. This parameter change allows the system to optimize between ripple current reduction and switching loss minimization depending on the operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If phase detector methods are used for synchronization in variable frequency systems, then phase detection is implemented, but phase detection error arises that depends on the speed and direction of frequency change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase detectionVSAvoidphase detection error
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual phase alignment is continuously monitored and compared against the desired alignment. The phase detector output feeds back to adjust the timing of subsequent phases, compensating for frequency changes and maintaining accurate synchronization despite variable operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary synchronization mechanism that mediates between the variable frequency operation and the fixed phase relationship requirements. This intermediary phase detection and adjustment system translates the variable frequency operation into consistent phase-aligned switching across all phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stability of the object's composition

If phase control loop is implemented for synchronization, then phase alignment is achieved, but the phase control loop interferes with the frequency control loop causing unnecessary current distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase alignmentVSAvoidcurrent distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control functions by implementing independent control loops for frequency and phase. The frequency control loop operates independently to set the switching frequency, while the phase control loop operates independently to maintain phase alignment, preventing interference between the two control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary phase adjustment mechanism that operates after frequency determination. This intermediary phase control stage adjusts timing based on detected phase errors without affecting the frequency control loop, thereby maintaining phase alignment while avoiding current distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12438449B2Power factor correction system, controller and method of controlling a power factor correction system
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • US12438449B2 patent drawing
  • US12438449B2 patent drawing
  • US12438449B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-phase PFC (power factor correction) system, controller, and method of controlling the multi-phase PFC system are described. The method includes operating the phases under variable frequency control to interleave current delivered by the plurality of phases to a load. During a switching cycle for the phases, a phase synchronization correction indicator is activated if a predetermined crossing point along a rising or falling slope of the current delivered by a second phase is misaligned with the same predetermined crossing point along the opposite slope of the current delivered by a first phase. During the next switching cycle, a switching period of the second phase is adjusted if the phase synchronization correction indicator was activated during the previous switching cycle.