Interleaved Character Selection Interface for Accurate Text Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices face challenges in providing accurate and efficient text input due to the compromise on button size for compactness, leading to inaccurately entered data.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an improved computer-processor implemented interface and method that uses overlapping selection buttons of two kinds, distinguished by input selection gestures, to enhance text input accuracy and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If selection buttons are made smaller to achieve compactness, then device portability and space utilization are improved, but button selection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidbutton selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single row of buttons to a two-dimensional grid layout with multiple rows and columns. This dimensional expansion allows buttons to be arranged in a compact grid pattern that fits within limited device space while maintaining adequate size for accurate selection. The grid structure enables efficient use of vertical and horizontal space simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the button interface into multiple rows and columns, creating a structured grid arrangement. This segmentation organizes the selection buttons in a systematic pattern that optimizes both space utilization and selectability. Each button occupies a defined position in the grid, making the interface compact while preserving clear boundaries for accurate button pressing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If selection buttons are made larger to improve selection accuracy, then button selection precision is improved, but device compactness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton selection accuracyVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By expanding from a single row to a multi-row grid structure, the patent accommodates larger button sizes without increasing the overall device footprint. The vertical dimension provides additional space for multiple rows of buttons, allowing each button to maintain adequate size for accurate selection while the compact grid layout keeps the total interface area small.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple rows of buttons into a compact grid structure that functions as a unified interface. This combining of multiple button rows into an integrated grid allows efficient space utilization while maintaining proper spacing and size for each individual button, achieving both compactness and selectability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If traditional non-overlapping button arrangement is used, then button boundaries are clear and selection is simple, but space utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection simplicityVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes a two-dimensional grid arrangement where buttons are positioned in multiple rows and columns with controlled overlaps. This dimensional approach allows buttons to share boundary regions efficiently, maximizing space utilization while maintaining clear visual distinction and unambiguous selection through the overlay mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic button selection mechanism where overlapping buttons are distinguished by different states or properties (such as active/inactive, selected/not selected). This dynamic differentiation allows the interface to maintain selection simplicity despite the overlapping arrangement, as the system actively manages which button is currently selectable based on user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Volume of moving object

If overlapping selection buttons are implemented to improve space utilization, then space efficiency is improved, but button selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidselection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic state management for overlapping buttons, where the selection system actively determines which button is currently active or selectable based on user input and button properties. This dynamic approach simplifies the selection process despite overlapping arrangements, as the system automatically manages ambiguity through state differentiation and active selection tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that provide visual or tactile confirmation of button selection status. This feedback system helps users understand which overlapping button is currently selectable or active, reducing the perceived complexity of the selection process. The feedback loop ensures that despite the overlapping arrangement, users receive clear information about their selection state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250138727A1Interleaved character selection interface
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 MURPHY MICHAEL WILLIAM
  • US20250138727A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138727A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138727A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are disclosed for selection of characters from an electronic user interface. In one embodiment, a letter selection interface displays letters in a row, some of which are recordable by an input interpreter and others that are unrecordable. In one embodiment, unrecordable letters visually separate letters that are both (1) recordable, and (2) assigned to different but adjacent selection buttons. In response to received touch-screen activations, an interpreter records recordable letter selections and a display displays both recordable and unrecordable letter selections. The interpreter composes a sequence of the recorded letters. An algorithm identifies alternatives to the recorded sequence by editing one or more letters of the sequence, such that each edit changes a selected letter to an adjacent unrecordable letter. The algorithm outputs words that match the originally composed sequence or one of the identified alternatives.