Interlocked Valve Control Assembly for Hydraulic Pressure Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic systems experience pressure spikes and premature failure of hydraulic seals due to improper sequencing of valve closures, which can lead to uncontrolled pressure and flow of hydraulic fluid during maintenance or operation.

Innovation Solution

A multiple valve control assembly that includes a first cam/lever assembly to close a pressure line valve before a second cam/lever assembly can close a tank line valve, ensuring the pressure line is locked out before the tank line, using a locking mechanism to prevent simultaneous rotation and maintain control over hydraulic fluid flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If both valves are closed simultaneously without sequencing, then the tank line can be closed, but pressure spikes occur on hydraulic seals causing premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic seal lifespanVSAvoidpressure spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The first cam/lever assembly is designed to close the pressure line valve before the second cam/lever assembly can close the tank line valve. The locking mechanism prevents the second valve from closing until the first valve is already closed, thereby preliminarily establishing the correct closure sequence and preventing pressure spikes on hydraulic seals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the pressure line valve is closed first without a locking mechanism, then the correct closure sequence is achieved, but simultaneous rotation of both cams is possible allowing improper sequencing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve closure sequencingVSAvoidcam rotation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A locking mechanism acts as an intermediary between the two cam/lever assemblies. This mechanism includes a locking surface on the first cam that engages with a corresponding surface on the second cam, preventing the second cam from rotating until the first cam has completed its closure motion. This ensures proper sequencing while maintaining ease of operation through a simple mechanical interlock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent simultaneous cam rotation, then valve sequencing is controlled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve closure controlVSAvoidcam/lever assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is merged with the existing cam/lever assemblies rather than being a separate independent system. The locking surfaces are integrated into the peripheral surfaces of the cams themselves, combining the valve actuation and interlocking functions into a unified structure. This minimizes additional complexity while ensuring reliable sequencing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11261995B2Multiple valve control assembly
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 CAIRN5 LLC
  • US11261995B2 patent drawing
  • US11261995B2 patent drawing
  • US11261995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multiple valve control assembly is described. The multiple valve control assembly includes a first cam/lever assembly to close a first valve, and a second cam/lever assembly to close a second valve. A first locking surface of the first cam/lever assembly, when the first cam/lever assembly is in the open position, physically blocks the rotation of the second cam/lever assembly. This provides for a pressure line to be closed by the first cam/lever assembly before the tank line can be closed by the second cam/lever assembly.