Interlocking Material Patterns for Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In additive manufacturing, materials with poor natural adhesion, such as epoxies and acrylates, often fail to bond effectively when used together in multi-material objects, leading to potential cleavage along material interfaces.

Innovation Solution

The method involves creating interlocking patterns in the geometry of material interfaces using three-dimensional additive manufacturing, where successive layers of different materials are deposited in complementary patterns to form interlocking structures that mechanically couple the materials, enhancing their bonding without relying on chemical adhesion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different materials are used to create multi-material objects with different properties, then the object can achieve functional versatility and optimized performance, but the materials do not naturally adhere to one another causing the composite structure to risk cleaving along boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidadhesion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The material interface is segmented into multiple interlocking regions with distinct geometric patterns. Each segment creates mechanical engagement through complementary shapes that physically interlock, preventing cleavage while maintaining the benefits of using different materials for different functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking pattern introduces local geometric variations at the material interface. Different regions of the interface have different interlocking geometries tailored to local stress conditions and material properties, optimizing both adhesion and functional performance in each specific area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If conventional adhesives are used to bond materials with poor natural adhesion, then bonding strength can be improved, but the complexity of the manufacturing process increases and additional materials are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interlocking geometric pattern enables the materials to bond to each other through their own structural configuration rather than requiring external adhesives. The complementary shapes create self-sustaining mechanical engagement that provides bonding strength without additional bonding agents or process steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the chemical bonding mechanism (adhesives) with a mechanical bonding mechanism (interlocking geometries). The physical interengagement of complementary shapes provides the necessary bonding strength through mechanical means rather than chemical adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If interlocking patterns are created at material interfaces to improve mechanical connection, then adhesion reliability is enhanced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion reliabilityVSAvoidinterface geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The interlocking pattern features nested complementary geometries where protrusions and recesses fit within each other. This nesting arrangement provides self-aligning characteristics that reduce sensitivity to manufacturing variations, as the interlocking shapes naturally guide proper alignment during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking interface creates a composite structure where the geometric interengagement acts as a mechanical composite that combines the strengths of different materials. The complementary shapes distribute stresses across the interface, reducing the impact of local manufacturing variations on overall adhesion reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach securely binds materials that would otherwise not adhere well, providing mechanical cohesion and resistance to tensile and shear forces, allowing for the creation of robust multi-material objects without the need for conventional adhesives.

Implementation Method 1

The printable liquid matrix material is solidified using UV or visible-light radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS12049037B2Material interlocking
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 INKBIT LLC
  • US12049037B2 patent drawing
  • US12049037B2 patent drawing
  • US12049037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprises using a three-dimensional additive manufacturing process to produce an interlocking volume, wherein using the additive manufacturing process includes depositing successive layers, each of which includes a first material distributed according to a first interlocking material pattern and a second material distributed according to a second interlocking material pattern, said second material differing from said first material.