Interlocking Refractory Bricks for Faster, Stable Furnace Installation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The assembly and installation of checker bricks in regenerative glass melting furnaces are labor-intensive, require skilled personnel, and result in unstable constructions prone to deformation and failure due to unidirectional load and vertical movement, leading to inefficiencies and potential collapse.
Innovation Solution
The use of refractory bricks with angled or curved geometry and interlocking protrusions and notches that form vertically oriented passageways, allowing for horizontal locking and secure stacking, enabling safer, faster installation and reducing localized stresses.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If conventional checker bricks with simple perpendicular geometry are used, then the construction process is simple, but the bricks are subject to easy displacement and shifting within individual layers, leading to instability
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies asymmetry by designing bricks with non-perpendicular geometry where adjacent bricks are angled relative to each other (e.g., 30-60 degree angles from vertical). This asymmetric arrangement prevents bricks from shifting horizontally or vertically, as the angled surfaces interlock to resist movement in multiple directions, thereby solving the stability problem while maintaining manufacturing simplicity
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs curvature by specifying that brick surfaces can be convex or concave (curved) rather than flat. These curved surfaces are designed to mate with complementary curved surfaces of adjacent bricks, creating an interlocking effect that prevents displacement and enhances the stability of the brick arrangement
2Stability of the object's composition
If interlocks between individual layers are added to increase stability, then vertical movement and slippage are reduced, but the construction requires many crane movements and significantly slows down the installation process
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-assembling complete layers of interlocking bricks on the ground outside the regenerator chamber before lifting them into position. This allows the complex interlocking arrangement to be constructed in advance with proper alignment, eliminating the need for time-consuming crane movements and adjustments during installation, thereby maintaining both stability and productivity
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the construction into discrete, complete layers that can be independently assembled and then stacked. Each layer is a self-contained unit with all interlocks already formed, allowing for efficient handling as a single module during installation while maintaining the stability benefits of interlocking design
3Ease of manufacture
If heavy construction load is unidirectionally projected from top to bottom, then the structure is simple to construct, but flaws in the assembly cannot be properly absorbed, generating local stress that may lead to shift and collapse
Solution Approach 1:
The asymmetric, angled brick arrangement redistributes the construction load by directing forces along the angled surfaces of adjacent bricks rather than purely vertically. This creates a more uniform stress distribution throughout the structure, preventing localized stress concentration at flaw points and enhancing reliability while maintaining construction simplicity
Solution Approach 2:
The curved (convex/concave) brick surfaces facilitate more uniform load distribution by allowing gradual force transfer between adjacent bricks rather than concentrated point contacts. This curvature-based design helps absorb and redistribute stresses throughout the structure, preventing local stress buildup that could lead to deformation or collapse
Data Source
AI summary
A refractory layer structure includes a plurality of refractory layers stacked on each other. Each of the refractory layers includes refractory bricks. Each of the refractory bricks is formed as a cuboid having a pair of oppositely positioned first diverging sides and a pair of oppositely positioned second diverging sides. The first diverging sides diverge away from each other from a top to a bottom of the refractory bricks. The second diverging sides diverge away from each other from the bottom to the top of the refractory bricks. The first diverging sides and the second diverging sides are connected to each other. Each of the first diverging sides have a first diverging side protrusion projecting from a top surface thereof. Each of the second diverging sides have a second diverging side protrusion projecting from a top surface thereof.


