Interlocking Shock-Absorbing Bumpers for Mobile Device Cases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective covers for mobile devices do not efficiently absorb impact energy, potentially damaging internal components due to rebound forces from elastic materials, and lack a quick disassembly feature for integrity checks, while also failing to provide a compact and aesthetically pleasing design.

Innovation Solution

A protective case with a rigid chassis and interlocking shock-absorbing bumpers that efficiently absorb impact energy, featuring a reversible and quick assembly design, allowing for the use of incompatible materials and a flexible outer layer to enhance ergonomics and appearance, while reducing manufacturing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If elastic materials are used to soften impacts, then the protective cover can absorb impact energy, but rebound forces are generated and transmitted to internal components causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidrebound force transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from elastic to viscous/dilatant, fundamentally altering the energy absorption mechanism. Viscous materials absorb energy through irreversible deformation and fluid-like flow rather than elastic rebound, eliminating the harmful rebound forces while maintaining energy absorption capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures combining rigid chassis with viscous shock-absorbing bumpers, and potentially multiple layers of different materials, to achieve both protection and energy dissipation without rebound. The composite structure allows each material to perform its specialized function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If protective covers are designed to be securely assembled, then structural integrity is maintained, but quick disassembly for integrity checks becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidquick disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the protective cover into separable modular components (chassis, bumpers, outer layer) that can be independently assembled and disassembled. This segmentation allows the cover to be securely assembled when closed yet easily taken apart for inspection by simply separating the modules from each other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If compatible materials are used for all components, then manufacturing is simpler, but energy-absorbing materials like silicon or polymer-based dilatant cannot be used due to incompatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial compatibilityVSAvoidenergy absorption capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (such as an adhesive layer, intermediate material, or mechanical interlocking feature) between incompatible materials like silicon/polymer-based dilatant bumpers and the rigid chassis. This intermediary enables the joining of materials that would otherwise be incompatible, allowing high energy-absorption materials to be used without manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively absorbs impact energy, reduces the risk of internal damage, allows for easy disassembly, and provides a cost-effective, compact, and aesthetically enhanced protective solution for various device sizes and brands.

Implementation Method 1

Known elastomeric covers/shells are used to soften impacts by absorbing energy elastically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

at least one shock-absorbing bumper can comprise one or more hooks configured to snap-fasten with said portions of the chassis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS20240275421A1Protective case for mobile device
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 GEORGE TFE SCP
  • US20240275421A1 patent drawing
  • US20240275421A1 patent drawing
  • US20240275421A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A protective case (1) configured to reversibly receive and retain a mobile device (10) comprising a rigid chassis (2) configured to receive the mobile device (10): a plurality of shock-absorbing bumpers (3) shaped to interlock with respective portions of said chassis (2).