Interlocking Honeycomb Slab Support for Fragile Stone Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Delicate stone and porcelain slabs are prone to breaking during fabrication and transportation due to their fragility, requiring expensive machinery and techniques that are inconsistent in effectiveness, and existing reinforcement methods like plywood and concrete are heavy, difficult to handle, and prone to warping or cracking.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, portable slab support system with interconnectable honeycomb panels made from high-durability aluminum, featuring a wave pattern for keyed engagement, providing structural reinforcement and ease of handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If plywood or concrete reinforcement is applied to the backing of delicate slabs, then structural integrity is improved, but weight increases making manual manipulation impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is divided into multiple individual panels rather than a single large sheet. Each panel is sized and weighted for easy manual handling, yet collectively they cover the entire slab surface to provide comprehensive structural support. The panels are applied in segments during the fabrication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite material construction where a lightweight core material is sandwiched between two thinner structural skins. This creates a high strength-to-weight ratio reinforcement system that provides concrete-like structural support without the excessive weight, enabling manual manipulation while maintaining slab integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If foam boards are used to absorb vibration during formation, then breakage during fabrication is reduced, but smaller fabricated pieces remain unstable and fragile after fabrication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreakage resistance during fabricationVSAvoidstability after fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement panels are applied to the delicate slab before the fabrication process begins. This preliminary reinforcement provides continuous support throughout cutting, handling, and formation operations, and remains in place after fabrication to stabilize the final product and smaller cut pieces, eliminating the need to remove support materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If cutting speed is reduced and machinery is recalibrated, then cut quality improves, but fabrication costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut qualityVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement panels are applied beforehand to cushion and support the delicate slab during the entire fabrication process. This protective layer allows machinery to operate at normal speeds with standard calibration while preventing breakage and ensuring cut quality, eliminating the need for costly slow-speed operations and frequent recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Strength

If plywood reinforcement is used, then structural support is provided, but plywood absorbs water causing warping, rotting, and mold over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system uses a non-absorbent core material with a closed-cell structure that prevents water penetration. This eliminates the water absorption issues that cause plywood to warp, rot, and develop mold, while maintaining structural support capabilities. The material remains dimensionally stable and resistant to degradation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

5Area of stationary object

If large sheets of reinforcement material are used, then complete slab coverage is achieved, but handling and installation become difficult without machinery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidease of handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is divided into multiple individual panels rather than a single large sheet. Each panel is sized and weighted for easy manual handling, yet collectively they cover the entire slab surface to provide comprehensive structural support. The panels are applied in segments during the fabrication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260035930A1Slab support
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 SAFEBOARD LLC
  • US20260035930A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035930A1 patent drawing
  • US20260035930A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The slab support includes a first panel sized to selectively attach to a relatively delicate slab, whereby at least one side of the first panel is non-linear. A second panel of the slab support is sized to selectively attach to the relatively delicate slab simultaneously with the first panel, whereby a non-linear side of the second panel is positionable relative to the non-linear side of the first panel for keyed engagement therewith when the first panel and the second panel selectively couple to the delicate slab to provide reinforcement thereto.