Interlocking Space Cell Architecture for Reconfigurable Orbital Assembly
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing space systems face challenges in scalability, vulnerability to nefarious activity, and the impact of subsystem failures, as well as the lack of ability to assemble and reconfigure space structures on a block-by-block basis and modify functionality dynamically.
Innovation Solution
The development of cell-based space systems that interlock and reconfigure ensemble topology, allowing individual cells to connect and change orientation, featuring components like cameras, sensors, antennas, and propulsion systems, and enable dynamic reconfiguration and modular assembly in space.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Area of moving object
If space systems are increased in size as a monolithic entity, then more transponders, higher power beams, more aperture can be achieved, but the system becomes more vulnerable to nefarious activity and more expensive to launch
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the space system into multiple independent cellular modules that can be launched separately and assembled in orbit. Each cell is a self-contained functional unit with standardized interfaces, allowing the system to achieve large scale without requiring a single large monolithic launch vehicle. This segmentation reduces vulnerability by isolating potential attack vectors to individual cells rather than exposing a large monolithic system.
2Area of moving object
If space systems are increased in size as a monolithic entity, then more transponders, higher power beams, more aperture can be achieved, but the launch vehicle requirements become larger and more costly
Solution Approach 1:
The system architecture segments the space platform into standardized cellular modules that can be launched using existing, smaller launch vehicles. Each cell contains integrated subsystems (power, thermal control, communication, propulsion) that allow independent launch and assembly in orbit, eliminating the need for oversized launch vehicles required by monolithic designs.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transitions from ground-based system assembly to in-orbit assembly, utilizing the spatial dimension of orbit as the assembly environment. Cells are launched to orbit and assembled through automated docking mechanisms, effectively moving the assembly process from the ground dimension to the orbital dimension, thereby avoiding large launch vehicle requirements.
3Area of moving object
If space systems are increased in size as a monolithic entity, then more transponders, higher power beams, more aperture can be achieved, but the failure of a critical subsystem can render the entire system inoperative
Solution Approach 1:
The space system is divided into modular cells with standardized mechanical and utility interfaces, where each cell functions as an independent operational unit. This modular architecture ensures that failures in one cell are isolated and do not propagate to other cells, maintaining system-level reliability even as the overall system size increases.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent enables the replacement of failed or compromised cells with functional cells from a supply fleet. The standardized interfaces and automated docking capabilities allow for the discarding of defective cells and their replacement with operational ones, thereby recovering system functionality without requiring complex servicing missions.
4Adaptability or versatility
If conventional space systems are used, then existing functionality is maintained, but the ability to assemble and reconfigure space structures on a block-by-block basis is lacking
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs universal standardized interfaces and docking mechanisms that enable any cell to connect with any other cell through automated mechanisms. This universality allows for flexible reconfiguration of the space system topology without requiring cell-specific assembly procedures, reducing the complexity of multi-block assembly operations.
Solution Approach 2:
The cells are equipped with automated docking mechanisms and alignment systems that enable self-assembly and self-docking in orbit without requiring complex external assembly equipment or human intervention. The standardized mechanical and utility interfaces allow cells to autonomously connect and configure themselves, reducing the complexity of the overall assembly process.
Data Source
AI summary
Cell-based systems may interlock in a reconfigurable configuration to support a mission. Space systems, for example, of a relatively large size may be assembled using an ensemble of individual “cells”, which are individual space vehicles. The cells may be held together via magnets, electromagnets, mechanical interlocks, etc. The topology or shape of the joined cells may be altered by cells hopping, rotating, or “rolling” along the joint ensemble. The cells may be multifunctional, mass producible units. Rotation of cell faces, or of components within cells, may change the functionality of the cell. The cell maybe collapsible for stowage or during launch.