Interlocking Tongue and Groove Planting Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vertically integrated planting systems face challenges with uneven weight distribution, limited sunlight access, and complex assembly requirements, as well as the need for separate saucers and radial arrangements that restrict spatial flexibility and optimal growth conditions.

Innovation Solution

An interlocking tongue and groove vegetation planting assembly featuring pentagon-shaped and triangle-shaped plant containers with sloped sidewalls and drainage holes, supported by central tongues and legs that fit together in a snug relationship, allowing for self-supporting vertical stacking and even weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If radial-shaped planters are stacked with offset alternating planters around a central cavity, then the stacking mechanism is achieved, but the stability is contingent on equal weight distribution and requires separate saucers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking mechanismVSAvoidassembly and reconfiguration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The planter is divided into modular components: a planter body with integrated saucer, and a separate support block with tongue-and-groove features. This segmentation allows independent assembly of stacking units that can be easily configured and reconfigured without requiring separate saucers or complex alignment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A support block acts as an intermediary component between planters. The support block features a tongue that fits into the groove of the planter body and legs that rest on the integrated saucer, mediating the connection and distributing weight evenly without requiring separate saucers for each planter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If planters are arranged in radial shape, then stacking is achieved, but the system must be placed strategically for sunlight access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking arrangementVSAvoidsunlight access
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The planter body features an asymmetric design with a flat back and a curved front, creating an offset arrangement when stacked. This asymmetric configuration allows sunlight to reach plants in lower planters while maintaining stable stacking, eliminating the need for strategic placement concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a traditional radial/vertical stacking arrangement to an offset horizontal arrangement. By utilizing the horizontal dimension through the offset design, sunlight can penetrate to lower levels while maintaining structural stability, effectively adding a spatial dimension to the stacking solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If separate saucers are used to secure the base of stacked planting structure, then stability is achieved, but the entire system must be taken apart to change bottommost plants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase stabilityVSAvoidplanter reconfiguration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The saucer is merged with the planter body as an integrated component rather than a separate piece. This integration allows the planter to be detached and reconfigured by simply removing the planter from its support block, eliminating the need to disassemble the entire stacked structure to access or replace bottommost plants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If shallow interconnecting pot leg structures and depressions are used for stacking, then basic stacking is achieved, but weight distribution is uneven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking structureVSAvoidweight distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The support block serves as an intermediary component between planters, featuring a tongue that fits into the groove of the planter body and legs that rest on the integrated saucer. This intermediary structure distributes weight evenly across multiple contact points, preventing uneven stress concentration that occurs with simple leg-and-depression stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11006582B2Interlocking tongue and groove vegetation planting assembly
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 ARROYO PATRICIA
  • US11006582B2 patent drawing
  • US11006582B2 patent drawing
  • US11006582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interlocking tongue and groove vegetation planting assembly provides a self-supporting arrangement of pentagon-shaped plant containers and triangle-shaped plant containers that are alternatively stacked, and detachably fitted together with support blocks having a central tongue on one end and a pair of legs on an opposite end that fit together in a tongue-and-groove relationship through the support sleeve. Both the pentagon-shaped and triangle-shaped plant containers include a plant chamber, and an adjacent support sleeve. The plant chamber has multiple sidewalls sloped at an angle. The plant chamber also has a floor wall that forms drainage holes near the junction of the plant chamber and the support sleeve sidewalls. The pentagon-shaped plant container is half the width and length of the triangle-shaped plant container to allow sunlight to reach lower stacked triangle-shaped plant chambers. The tongue-and-groove stacking arrangement creates multiple points of contact throughout each sidewall for equal weight distribution.