Interlocking Variable-Stiffness Beam for Flexible Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional beams face limitations in flexibility and load-bearing capacity, particularly when made from materials like solid wood or metal, which can lead to unacceptable bending or collapse under typical loads, and they are not easily adaptable for storage and transport.

Innovation Solution

A variably rigid beam assembly composed of interlocking tension and compression elements that can be separated and joined to achieve significant changes in flexibility, allowing for high flexibility in the separated state for storage and transport, and increased stiffness in the joined state for load-bearing applications, using materials like thin plastics or polymers with embedded fibers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional beams are made from solid wood or metal to increase strength and stiffness, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but weight increases and adaptability for storage and transport deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidadaptability for storage and transport
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into multiple separate beam members that can be independently handled, stored, and transported. Each member contains tension elements and compression elements that can be separated from one another, allowing the beam to be disassembled into compact components for storage and then reassembled into a high-strength structure when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The beam structure transitions from a static, fixed-state design to a dynamic, reconfigurable system. The beam members can dynamically change between a joined configuration (providing high stiffness and strength for load-bearing) and a separated configuration (providing flexibility for storage and transport), allowing the structure to adapt to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If beam thickness is reduced to decrease weight and improve flexibility for storage, then adaptability is improved, but bending stress resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility for storageVSAvoidbending stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The beam employs composite construction by combining tension elements and compression elements made from different materials optimized for their specific functions. The tension elements use materials with high tensile strength, while compression elements use materials with high compressive strength, creating a composite structure that achieves high strength-to-weight ratio and flexibility when separated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If traditional beams are designed for high stiffness to support loads, then strength is improved, but flexibility for storage and transport deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness for load supportVSAvoidflexibility for storage and handling
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is segmented into multiple beam members that can be separated from one another. When separated, each member is flexible and easy to handle, store, and transport. When joined together through interlocking tension and compression elements, the members form a stiff, load-bearing structure. This segmentation allows the system to exhibit both flexibility and stiffness depending on the operational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The beam system dynamically transitions between two distinct states: a flexible, separated state for storage and handling, and a stiff, joined state for load-bearing applications. This dynamic reconfigurability allows the same structure to optimize its mechanical properties based on operational requirements, eliminating the need to choose between flexibility and stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If beam members are separated to increase flexibility for storage, then adaptability is improved, but load-bearing capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility for storageVSAvoidload-bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The beam members are pre-designed with interlocking features, including protrusions and recesses, that enable quick and easy assembly and disassembly. The tension elements and compression elements are pre-configured with complementary geometries that automatically align and lock together when joined, eliminating the need for complex fastening operations and ensuring proper load distribution from the moment of assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11578835B2Variable stiffness beam
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 SANDERS MICHAEL
  • US11578835B2 patent drawing
  • US11578835B2 patent drawing
  • US11578835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A beam assembly includes a first beam member and a second beam member. The first and second beam members are both flexible when separated from each other. The first and second beam members each include compression and tension elements. The first and second beam members can be joined to form a stiff beam by interleaving the compression elements of the first and second beam members.