Internal climate control system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining and maintaining optimal storage conditions in climate-controlled regions, such as refrigerated sections of vehicles, are inaccurate and resource-intensive, lacking flexibility and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A system that continuously monitors temperature conditions using detection sensors, analyzes data from integrated cargo sensors, compares temperature ranges, and activates a response action when a threshold difference is detected, adjusting the cooling apparatus and alerting personnel to ensure optimal storage conditions for various cargo types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional manual methods are used to determine storage conditions, then flexibility and adaptability are limited, but the system complexity and resource requirements are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in addressing specific object storage requirementsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by having cargo sensors automatically detect and communicate cargo type information to the controller, which then autonomously determines appropriate storage conditions and adjusts climate control settings without requiring manual intervention or complex external systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions by integrating cargo detection data processing, temperature range determination, climate control adjustment, and alert generation into a single device, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high adaptability to different cargo types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then resource efficiency is poor, but measurement precision and detection accuracy are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in determining storage conditionsVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by having cargo sensors constantly monitor cargo presence and type, with the controller receiving real-time data and continuously adjusting climate control settings to maintain optimal storage conditions, improving accuracy while optimizing energy usage through responsive rather than constant operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by determining appropriate temperature ranges and storage conditions before cargo is loaded or immediately upon detection, allowing the climate control system to be pre-configured for optimal efficiency rather than requiring trial-and-error adjustments that waste energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual intervention is used to adjust storage conditions, then response time is slow, but automation level is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of responding to storage requirementsVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves self-service automation where the controller automatically receives cargo sensor data, determines appropriate storage conditions, and adjusts climate control settings without human intervention, enabling immediate response to storage requirements while maintaining simple operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback from cargo sensors to the controller enables automatic detection of cargo type and immediate adjustment of storage conditions, eliminating manual response delays while the automated system maintains simplicity through rule-based decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If a single temperature setting is maintained, then energy consumption is reduced, but adaptability to different cargo types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to accommodate different cargo typesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by determining and maintaining different temperature ranges for different cargo types based on their specific storage requirements, with the controller adjusting climate control settings locally according to the detected cargo characteristics rather than applying a uniform temperature setting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination of appropriate temperature ranges for detected cargo types before climate control adjustment is needed, allowing efficient energy consumption by pre-calculating optimal settings rather than requiring energy-intensive trial-and-error adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10935291B2Internal climate control system
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10935291B2 patent drawing
  • US10935291B2 patent drawing
  • US10935291B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for enabling climate control is provided. The method includes monitoring a refrigerated section of a vehicle. The refrigerated section includes a first cargo container comprising a first cargo type and first sensors describing the first cargo type. A cooling apparatus of the vehicle is currently maintaining a first specified temperature range within the refrigerated section. Second integrated cargo sensors describing a second cargo type of a second cargo container being placed within the refrigerated section of the vehicle are detected and associated data is analyzed. A second specified temperature range for storing the second cargo type is determined and compared to the first specified temperature range. An associated difference is compared to a temperature range threshold value and a response action associated with the first cargo container and the second cargo container is executed.