Internal Coolant Recirculation for Low-Flow Impingement Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooling infrastructure cannot support the peak performance of jet impingement cooling modules due to the inability to maintain a 2×-4× increase in flow rate, necessitating a reduction in flow requirements without compromising cooling performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing internal recirculation of liquid coolant fluid within the cooling module, allowing it to impinge on cooling surfaces multiple times before exiting, thereby reducing flow rate demand and minimizing pressure losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If impingement cooling modules operate at higher flow rates to achieve peak performance, then cooling performance is improved, but flow rate consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling performanceVSAvoidflow rate consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling module is divided into multiple impingement zones with nozzle arrays positioned at different locations. The coolant flow path is segmented into multiple stages where coolant serves different cooling zones sequentially, allowing the same coolant to perform multiple cooling functions before exiting the module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coolant undergoes periodic recirculation through multiple impingement zones in sequence. The flow path is designed so that coolant passes through nozzle arrays at different positions, creating a periodic action where the same coolant volume is repeatedly used for cooling different sections of the heat source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Quantity of substance

If external recirculation is used to reduce flow rate demand, then flow rate consumption is reduced, but additional external seals and pressure losses are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate consumptionVSAvoidexternal seal requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recirculation function is merged into the internal structure of the cooling module itself. Multiple nozzle arrays and impingement zones are integrated within the module housing, eliminating the need for separate external recirculation systems and their associated seals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling module is designed to recirculate coolant internally through its own structured flow paths and impingement zones without requiring external recirculation infrastructure. The module serves its own recirculation needs using internally integrated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If multiple impingement zones are added to increase cooling coverage, then cooling performance is improved, but flow rate demand increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling coverageVSAvoidflow rate demand
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling surface is divided into multiple zones served by different nozzle arrays positioned at various locations. Each zone receives coolant from dedicated nozzles, allowing targeted cooling of specific high-heat areas without requiring proportional increases in overall flow rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the heat source are addressed by locally positioned nozzle arrays that deliver coolant precisely where needed. The flow distribution is optimized for local cooling requirements rather than uniform coverage, reducing total flow demand while maintaining effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces flow rate requirements by approximately 50% to 67% while maintaining cooling performance, avoiding additional external seals and pressure drops.

Implementation Method 1

Impingement cooling modules produce very high local heat transfer coefficients. Performance of cooling modules utilizing impingement cooling are driven by both flow rate and pressure drop.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpingement cooling: Jet

Implementation Method 2

The cooling performance of direct-to-chip single phase liquid cooling (DLC) devices is typically measured in terms of heat transfer coefficients.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

the same liquid cooling fluid impinges the surfaces of the heat-generating electronic components (or cooling plates in thermal communication with the heat-generating electronic components) multiple times

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS12432878B2Internal recirculation cooling module
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 JETCOOL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12432878B2 patent drawing
  • US12432878B2 patent drawing
  • US12432878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved cooling modules and methods are configured to recirculate the liquid coolant fluid inside the cooling modules so that the same liquid cooling fluid impinges the surfaces of the heat-generating electronic components (or cooling plates in thermal communication with the heat-generating electronic components) multiple times before exiting the cooling module, thereby allowing a given flow of coolant fluid to be re-used several times over. With each re-use of the coolant fluid, the flow rate demand drops, reducing infrastructure required to achieve higher performance in direct and indirect micro-convective impingement cooling applications.