Internal Slip Teeth Geometry to Reduce Packer Backlash

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing internal slips in sealing/anchoring subassemblies for packer systems suffer from backlash and set back issues, leading to loss of setting force and relaxation of packer elements, which affect sealing performance, particularly in large size packers.

Innovation Solution

The development of internal slips with symmetrical teeth on the outer diameter, which enhance geometrical constraint and reduce backlash, improving sealing performance and maintaining setting force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional internal slips are used in packer systems, then the structure is simple, but backlash and set back occur leading to loss of setting force and relaxation of packer elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidtooth geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing teeth with different geometry on opposite sides of the tubular - one side has a symmetrical tooth profile while the other side has an asymmetrical tooth profile. This asymmetrical design creates geometrical constraint that prevents backlash and set back, thereby improving sealing performance and maintaining setting force without requiring complex additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If internal slips with more teeth are used to reduce backlash, then sealing performance improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidtooth manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing different tooth geometries at different locations around the tubular circumference. Specifically, teeth on one side have symmetrical profiles while teeth on the opposite side have asymmetrical profiles. This localized differentiation provides the necessary geometrical constraint to eliminate backlash while keeping the overall manufacturing process relatively simple and the number of teeth manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If symmetrical teeth are used on all sides of the tubular, then manufacturing is easier, but geometrical constraint is insufficient to prevent backlash

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth manufacturing easeVSAvoidratcheting stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by introducing asymmetry in the tooth geometry on one side of the tubular while maintaining symmetry on the other side. The asymmetrical tooth profile creates the necessary geometrical constraint that enhances ratcheting stiffness and prevents backlash, while the symmetrical teeth on the opposite side maintain manufacturing simplicity. This hybrid approach achieves both manufacturing ease and sufficient stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20250361781A1Internal slip including one or more symmetrical teeth
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US20250361781A1 patent drawing
  • US20250361781A1 patent drawing
  • US20250361781A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an internal slip, a sealing/anchoring subassembly, a well system, and method. The internal slip, in one aspect, includes a tubular, the tubular having a tubular inner diameter (IDt) and a tubular outer diameter (ODt). The internal slip, in this aspect, further includes a first set of teeth disposed along the tubular inner diameter (IDt), the first set of teeth configured to engage with base teeth disposed on a base outer diameter (ODB) of a base positioned radially inside of the tubular. The internal slip, in this aspect, further includes a second set of teeth disposed along the tubular outer diameter (ODt), the second set of teeth configured to engage with stroke sleeve teeth disposed on a stroke sleeve outer diameter (ODSS) of a stroke sleeve positioned radially outside of the tubular, wherein one or more of the second set of teeth are generally symmetrical about a centerline thereof.